In the middle of the dispute is the couple's 4-year-old daughter, who was born in Italy and ferried by the mother to the U.S. at two months old, but later ordered by a court to return to Italy when the father filed a lawsuit.
In the middle is the couple's 4 and a half-year-old daughter -- identified in court documents by her initials"A.M.T." -- born in Italy, ferried by the mother to the U.S. at two months old, but later ordered by a court to return to Italy when the father filed a lawsuit.
The case, involving the Hague Convention of 1980, represented a rare instance of child custody issues before the nation's highest court. The family drama captivated the justices and clearly pulled at heartstrings.The U.S. Supreme Court Building is seen in Washington, April 19, 2018.The mother, Michelle Monasky, pleaded with the justices in court documents, saying the transatlantic separation is"not only deeply hurtful... but also highly detrimental to [her daughter's] development." The father, Domenico Taglieri, who won parental rights in an Italian court after Monasky fled with their baby to the U.S., says the international treaty dictates that his child's"habitual residence" shall be Italy. The Supreme Court will now decide whether it agrees with Taglieri, or whether A.M.T. should be returned to her mother in the U.S. The court could also establish a clear standard for determining an infant's"habitual residence" and how lower court's should apply it going forward.Chief Justice John Roberts poses for the official group photo at the US Supreme Court in Washington, Nov. 30, 2018. Chief Justice John Roberts poses for the official group photo at the US Supreme Court in Washington, Nov. 30, 2018."We're talking about an international convention, but none of the other parties have adopted your position," a skeptical Chief Justice John Roberts told Monasky's attorney, who argues his client's intent to live in the U.S. should be overriding. "Why should it be here instead of there?" Justice Sonia Sotomayor said, sharing her skepticism."Why is it an American court rather than Italian court dealing with this custody issue?""This is family law. Families differ," Breyer quipped."How do we know what's in the best interest of a child? Federal judges don't know much about this." The Trump administration also participated in the argument opposing"rigid per se tests" to establishing a child's habitual residency for purposes of custody. Habitual residency"is a meaningless concept when you're talking about someone eight weeks old," Roberts said."They don't even have habits... well, except one or two."Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is photographed in the West conference room at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., Aug. 30, 2013. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is photographed in the West conference room at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., Aug. 30, 2013.Monasky did receive some sympathy from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who noted that some accommodation might be necessary in difficult international cases of a mother fleeing violence. "This is a troublesome case because she alleged she was abused," Ginsburg told attorney Andrew Pincus, representing the father, Taglieri."So you're saying if she wants to escape domestic violence, she has to leave her child behind?" Pincus told the court, in an apparent attempt to show some deference to court sympathy for Monasky, that an Italian court is preparing to revisit the parental custody rights of A.M.T. in the future. He said that both parents currently have rights to see the child.
Please follow us on Google to support us United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rejects inmate's bid for sex reassignment surgeryUS Supreme Court declines to hear an appeal by a convicted murderer who filed a civil rights lawsuit because prison officials denied her request to be considered for gender reassignment surgery.
Read more »
Supreme Court Questions Government Bid to Avoid Paying Insurers Under Affordable Care ActA majority of Supreme Court justices questioned whether the federal government could avoid paying billions of dollars to health insurers that sold consumer policies on exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act.
Read more »
Insurers plead with Supreme Court for $12 billion in government reimbursements for ObamacareInsurers went to the Supreme Court seeking justice on $12 billion in Obamacare payments they say they are owed by the government
Read more »
Obamacare insurers may win a $12-billion claim in Supreme CourtSupreme Court seems supportive of a $12-billion claim by insurers who say they covered high-risk patients, then were subject to a 'bait-and-switch.'
Read more »
Supreme Court Upholds Kentucky Abortion Law That Mandates UltrasoundsIn a discouraging development, the Supreme Court has opted not to hear an appeal aimed at overturning Kentucky's anti-abortion ultrasound law.
Read more »
The Supreme Court rebuffs Donald Trump’s bid to hasten executionsAmerica's Supreme Court has rebuffed Donald Trump’s bid to hasten executions. But that may not stop America from executing federal prisoners as early as next month
Read more »