How Does Second Victim Syndrome Affect Surgeons?

Cardiac Surgeries News

How Does Second Victim Syndrome Affect Surgeons?
Cardiac SurgeryPTSDPTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • 📰 Medscape
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 410 sec. here
  • 27 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 233%
  • Publisher: 55%

Surgeons are at risk for negative psychological and professional consequences following surgical complications or errors.

It is estimated that nearly 50% of healthcare providers will face this syndrome at least once in their career. Moreover, as much as 20% of hospitalized patients may experience a complication. Some specialties are particularly exposed to SVS, including surgery, The presentation varies, bringing prolonged emotional consequences for some and affecting the personal life and professional practice of others.

. The consequences can be psychological , cognitive , social, cultural, spiritual, and physical. There are mainly quantitative data on the frequency of SVS; few qualitative studies are available. Most published research does not focus on surgical specialties, even though surgeons face stressful situations and technical challenges daily, making them particularly susceptible to SVS. Strength and emotional control are part of the typical surgeon stereotype. Consequently, the occurrence of a surgical complication is most often approached only from a technical standpoint without accepting its emotional consequences.. Thirteen qualitative studies, either cross-sectional or in the form of semistructured interview reports, were selected. The studies were conducted in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and France. The analysis focused on a cohort of 1069 surgeons from various specialties. The psychological, physical, and professional impacts of SVS were distinguished, as were the factors affecting the response to the causal event. Psychologically, the most frequently described negative feelings were guilt, depression, anxiety, frustration, and embarrassment. These feelings had social, personal, and professional repercussions, including self-restriction of leisure activities and. Most of these negative feelings lasted between 1 week and 1 month after the causal event and were more pronounced in female surgeons and those in aesthetic surgery.Guilt was the most commonly expressed feeling , because of the unique relationship that surgeons have with patients, primarily based on responsibility. Guilt was more pronounced in cases of patient death, especially among practitioners with close relationships with their patients and families. It was also the most persistent negative feeling, sometimes with intense reminiscences about complications encountered in the past and amnesia of names, families, and faces. Guilt often coincided with depressive symptoms, which affected between 12.5% and 52% of surgeons according to studies. Anxiety was also frequently described as disturbing, invasive, and restless. It was often associated with anger and frustration and sometimes manifested as rudeness toward patients or the operating room team. Beyond provoking negative feelings, an error or the occurrence of a complication affected judgment and self-confidence, leading toThis reaction could sometimes result in excessively cautious attitudes that affect performance, with shifts to other specialties or even early retirement. For some, SVS manifested physically as headaches, weight fluctuations, nausea, abdominal pain, and palpitations. However, these symptoms were often short-lived.SVS impaired professional performance, led to avoidance behaviors, and often had medical-legal or disciplinary implications. Most surgeons believed that their professional behavior had not been optimal, and this judgment frequently resulted in the cessation of certain activities or types of interventions, with this conservative attitude sometimes to the detriment of patients. Similarly, surgeons became more meticulous in maintaining medical records and tracing consent. More generally, surgeons were concerned about their reputation and suffered from professional dissatisfaction, especially given the prevalent criticism and condemnation in this highly competitive environment. The perception of a lack of support from peers was amplified by the absence of support from hospital institutions, with the fear of seeing their positions questioned. However, surgical complications could sometimes be beneficial because they forced surgeons to rethink and reflect on their roles, as well as that of their service and institutions. On an individual level, some surgeons said that they became more cautious, more vigilant, and better understood safety issues. At the service and institutional level, improvements were noted in procedures , protocols , and communication with administration.The factors influencing the reaction to a surgical complication depended on the circumstances and nature of the complication, the surgeon's personality, and the assistance received. A complication was better received if the patient was older, had comorbidities, or had an unexpected anatomical problem than it was if it occurred in a young, healthy individual. A complication following emergency surgery was more easily tolerated than one after a scheduled intervention. Conversely, a perioperative complication, due to a judgment error or technical problem, was very poorly received. This was also the case for certain events or sequelae . The individual response depended on personality and experience, which, while helpful, also exacerbated responsibility. Different personality types were observed within the cohort. Some were very close to their patients . Others isolated themselves, repressed their emotions, moved forward, and tried not to be distracted in their future decisions. Conversely, others completely collapsed after the complication. Finally, another approach was observed with reassurance and rationalization regarding complications being part of the job, being necessarily multifactorial, and requiring time and self-work.This range of responses contributed to the variability in the intensity of SVS. Participants in these studies admitted their lack of skills to manage complications from a nontechnical point of view. Younger individuals highlighted their isolation in this area and the lack of or poor quality of training. In this competitive and reportedly unsympathetic environment marked by easy criticism, morbidity and mortality reviews were experienced by some as an opportunity for public blame instead of a source of learning and improvement. As a result, surgeons remained on the defensive, cutting the dialogue short. Even if the atmosphere could be constructive, the debate was mainly focused on technical issues rather than on psychological consequences. Finally, the lack of administrative support was emphasized, contributing to this culture of blame, with mainly punitive responses and without analysis of the underlying systemic causes. Many practitioners would have liked standardized help in the form of a break from their activities, discussions with colleagues to facilitate communication with patients, and formal psychological assistance. When this type of help was standardized, the atmosphere during MMR was much calmer. Exchanges with colleagues were by far considered the most effective help , especially for younger individuals. Many would have liked to stop for a while, but very few did, getting back on track immediately after the event.This study contradicts the stereotype of surgeons being in control of their emotions. On the contrary, they can be affected by feelings of guilt, depression, and self-questioning after a complication. These negative ideas can cause burnout, posttraumatic shock, and even suicidal thoughts.of 622 academic surgeons, experienced or in training, showed that 15.9% were currently depressed and 13.2% had had suicidal thoughts in the past year. These destructive phenomena are self-perpetuating, and medical errors are clearly associated with depression, anxiety, posttraumatic shock, alcohol consumption, The authors advocate not only for information and programs focused on SVS in training but also for a change in culture within the surgical environment. This change could benefit from the feminization of surgical specialties because this studyshow that female doctors are not only more prone to SVS but also more open to exchanges and assistance from their peers and the institution. Note that quantitative studies are susceptible to inherent bias, either by over- or underreporting, which can affect the evaluation of the prevalence and impact of SVS., which is part of the Medscape professional network, using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Medscape /  🏆 386. in US

Cardiac Surgery PTSD PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Situational Stress Medical Life Physician Lifestyle Medical Lifestyle Resident Lifestyle Medical Student Lifestyle Nurse Lifestyle Surgical Complication Anxiety Disorder Depression Pain Management Anxiety Acute Pain

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Second-most expensive CryptoPunk ever sells — for the second time — in MarchSecond-most expensive CryptoPunk ever sells — for the second time — in MarchThis sale is the second second-most expensive CryptoPunk sale to occur this month after a $16.03 million transaction on March 4.
Read more »

U.S. surgeons transplant gene-edited pig kidney into patient for first timeU.S. surgeons transplant gene-edited pig kidney into patient for first timeDoctors in Boston have transplanted a pig kidney into a 62-year-old patient, the latest experiment in the quest to use animal organs in humans.
Read more »

Surgeons complete first-ever gene-edited pig kidney transplantSurgeons complete first-ever gene-edited pig kidney transplantMack DeGeurin is a tech reporter who’s spent years investigating where technology and politics collide. His work has previously appeared in Gizmodo, Insider, New York Magazine, and Vice.
Read more »

Surgeons Perform World's First Pig Kidney TransplantSurgeons Perform World's First Pig Kidney TransplantSurgeons in Boston have successfully transplanted a genetically altered pig kidney into a patient, marking a significant step in providing more readily available organs for transplantation. The procedure took place at Massachusetts General Hospital and the patient is recovering well.
Read more »

China to launch AI chatbot for surgeons, based on Meta platforms’ Llama 2.0China to launch AI chatbot for surgeons, based on Meta platforms’ Llama 2.0China embraces AI with a domestic AI surgery consultant, aiding physicians with real-time advice. Find out what it means for medicine.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-04-02 12:33:13