Google has been branded an abusive monopolist by a federal judge for the second time in less than a year, this time for illegally exploiting some of its online marketing technology to the profits fueling an internet empire currently worth $1.8 trillion. The ruling issued Thursday by U.S.
Trump administration takes aim at Harvard's international students and tax-exempt statusLast chance time: Hawks-Heat, Grizzlies-Mavericks to decide final NBA playoff spots on FridayDrake complains about Kendrick Lamar's 'Not Like Us' Super Bowl performance in new defamation claimsAP Entertainment WireEndangered sea turtle populations show signs of recovery in more than half the world, survey findsFACT FOCUS: Warren Buffett did not praise Trump's recent economic policiesA restaurant in Havana defies Cuba's tech struggles with digital menus and a robot waitressBehind the story of the decades-long journey of xenotransplantationIs 'microcheating' a new kind of infidelity for the social media age?Community, mentors and skill-building: Experts weigh the role of employee resource groupsAP PHOTOS: Rain or shine, emotions run high at Seville's Holy Week processions in SpainThe World in PicturesDraft budget plan proposes deep cuts across federal health programsExperts recommendations on RSV and meningitis vaccines will go to ex-prosecutor now at CDCBoys with cancer can face infertility as adults.
Can storing their stem cells help?Elon Musk installed his top lieutenants at a federal agency you probably haven't heard ofTaking a mental health leave from work is an option most people don't know aboutAid groups: Thousands of children in Gaza are malnourished under Israel's blockadeVarias personas llevadas a hospital tras tiroteo en universidad de Florida Can storing their stem cells help?Elon Musk installed his top lieutenants at a federal agency you probably haven't heard ofTaking a mental health leave from work is an option most people don't know aboutAid groups: Thousands of children in Gaza are malnourished under Israel's blockadeVarias personas llevadas a hospital tras tiroteo en universidad de FloridaA man walks past Google’s offices in London’s Kings Cross area, on Aug. 10, 2024. SAN FRANCISCO — Google has been branded an abusive monopolist by a federal judge for the second time in less than a year, this time for illegally exploiting some of its online marketing technology to boost the profits fueling an internet empire currently worth $1.8 trillion.President Joe Biden’s ensuing administration in an attempt to undercut the power that Google has amassed since its inception in a Silicon Valley garage in 1998. Although antitrust regulators prevailed both times, the battle is likely to continue for several more years as Google tries to overturn the two monopoly decisions in appeals while forging ahead in the new and highly lucrative technological frontier ofBillionaire tech leaders’ move toward Trump has created a split with workers in Silicon ValleyThe next step in the latest case is a penalty phase that will likely begin late this year or early next year. The same so-called remedy hearings in the search monopoly case are scheduled to begin Monday in Washington D.C., where Justice Department lawyers will try to convince U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta to impose a sweeping punishment that includes Brinkema’s 115-page decision centers on the marketing machine that Google has spent the past 17 years building around its search engine and other widely used products and services, including its Chrome browser, YouTube video site and digital maps. The system was largely built around a series of acquisitions that started with Google’s $3.2 billion purchase of online ad specialist DoubleClick in 2008. U.S. regulators approved the deals at the time they were made before realizing that they had given the Mountain View, California, company a platform to manipulate the prices in an ecosystem that a wide range of websites depend on for revenue and provides a vital marketing connection to consumers. The Justice Department lawyers argued that Google built and maintained dominant market positions in a technology trifecta used by website publishers to sell ad space on their webpages, as well as the technology that advertisers use to get their ads in front of consumers, and the ad exchanges that conduct automated auctions in fractions of a second to match buyer and seller.Brinkema reached a decision that rejected the Justice Department’s assertions that Google has been mistreating advertisers while concluding the company has been abusing its power to stifle competition to the detriment of online publishers forced to rely on its network for revenue. “For over a decade, Google has tied its publisher ad server and ad exchange together through contractual policies and technological integration, which enabled the company to establish and protect its monopoly power in these two markets.” Brinkema wrote. “Google further entrenched its monopoly power by imposing anticompetitive policies on its customers and eliminating desirable product features.” Despite that rebuke, Brinkema also concluded that Google didn’t break the law when it snapped Doubleclick nor when it followed up that deal a few years later by buying another service, Admeld. The Justice Department “failed to show that the DoubleClick and Admeld acquisitions were anticompetitive,” Brinkema wrote. “Although these acquisitions helped Google gain monopoly power in two adjacent ad tech markets, they are insufficient, when viewed in isolation, to prove that Google acquired or maintained this monopoly power through exclusionary practices.” That finding may help Google fight off any attempt to force it to sell its advertising technology to stop its monopolistic behavior.In a statement, Google said it will appeal the ruling. “We disagree with the Court’s decision regarding our publisher tools,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs. “Publishers have many options and they choose Google because our ad tech tools are simple, affordable and effective.” Analysts such as Brian Pitz of BMO Markets had been predicting that Google would likely lose the case, helping to brace investors for the latest setback to the company and its corporate parent, Alphabet Inc., whose shares declined 1% in afternoon trading. Alphabet’s stock has plunged by 20% so far this year. As it did in the search monopoly case, Google and its corporate parent Alphabet vehemently denied the Justice Department’s allegations. Their lawyers argued the government largely based its case on an antiquated concept of a market that existed a decade ago while underestimating a highly competitive market for advertising spending that includes the likes of Facebook parent Meta Platforms, Amazon, Microsoft and Comcast. The market as drawn in the Justice Department’s case didn’t include ads that appear on mobile apps, streaming television services, or other platforms to which internet users have increasingly migrated, prompting Google lawyer Karen Dunn to compare the government’s definition a “time capsule with a BlackBerry, an iPod and a Blockbuster video card” during her opening statementAt trial, the Justice Department’s lawyers emphasized the harm to news publishers that has arisen from Google’s alleged dominance of the marketplace. Witnesses from Gannett, the publisher of USA Today and other newspapers, and News Corp., the publisher of The Wall Street Journal, testified about the difficulties they have faced and what they said was a lack of alternatives to Google’s ad tech. Those companies rely on online advertising to fund their news operations and make their articles free to consumers on the internet, government lawyers have argued. Now, government is in position to try to dismantle that byzantine ad system. When the case was filed more than two years ago during the Biden administration, the Justice Department asserted Google should be forced to sell, at a minimum, its Ad Manager product, which includes the technology used by website publishers and the ad exchange.Liedtke has been covering technology and wide range of other business topics for The Associated Press since the turn of the century.Trump administration plans to end the IRS Direct File program for free tax filing, AP sources sayThe EPA can’t end grants from $20 billion Biden-era fund for climate-friendly projects, a judge says
Inc. Meta Platforms Inc. Virginia U.S. Department Of Justice Monopoly And Antitrust Media And Entertainment Industry California General News AP Top News CA State Wire Internet Donald Trump Blackberry Ltd. Joe Biden Marketing And Advertising U.S. News Technology Comcast Corp. Business Brian Pitz Mobile Apps Amit Mehta Microsoft Corp. Streaming Media Lee Anne Mulholland Karen Dunn Bank Of Montreal News Corp. Legal Proceedings Amazon.Com Inc. Gannett Co. Inc. U.S. News
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Google Wallet is now kid-friendly with latest updateGoogle has updated Google Wallet to allow kids to use Tap to Pay with parental consent.
Read more »
Google finds 10,000 fake listings on Google Maps, sues alleged network of scammersA small business owner flagged a possible impersonator on Google Maps. Google's investigation found it was just the tip of the iceberg.
Read more »
Google sues alleged scammers over 10,000 fake Maps listingsGoogle is suing a man in connection with a Google Maps scam listing network.
Read more »
Google Cancels Google Assistant For Millions Of Users: Be ReadyGoogle Assistant is evolving into Gemini, bringing powerful new AI capabilities but also discontinuing some favorite features.
Read more »
Google Finally Tests Much-Requested Google Photos Search FeatureTired of scrolling through Google Photos albums? Learn about the new album search feature that lets you quickly find any collection. Save time & relive your memories.
Read more »
Sunshine Thursday, storms Thursday night, a few could be severeMontgomery, Alabama
Read more »