Philanthropic organizations look for ways to address the extraordinary, nationwide funding gap.
This spring the notices came without warning: Federal funding for thousands of approved research projects, many already under way, had been delayed or canceled. Among those left in the lurch were grant recipients seeking to do things like reduce vaccine hesitancy, improve access to healthcare for minority populations, orAll told, the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation withdrew or placed on hold almost $4 billion in funding.
And that money may be gone for the foreseeable future because the“So much has been cut by the wrecking-ball, bludgeoning approach that went on at NIH,” said Alonzo Plough, PhD, chief science officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation , Princeton, New Jersey. “They’re not just cutting bureaucrats and funding for projects that are not efficient. These are the pipelines that have put American bioscience at the forefront of the world, provided treatments that saved your family members’ lives.” Foundations are trying to meet the moment, doling out emergency support to the extent they can. RWJF, for its part, has several such initiatives, including grants for information gathering on climate change and health, tracking AIDS/“The billions and billions that have been cut are orders of magnitude bigger than anything philanthropy can patch,” Plough said. “We can keep certain things on life support, but life support is not a good thing to be on.”. Industry investment accounts for more than half of that, but corporations generally don’t step up until a concept is pretty far along, when they’re confident it will pay off. Most early-stage research doesn’t qualify. “Basic, fundamental research may not have an obvious application. Some of it may never lead to one,” said Cynthia Friend, PhD, chief executive officer of the Kavli Foundation, Los Angeles, which helps fund early research. “When those applications do come forth, the time scale is on average 20 years to end up at something useful.” Support for the long haul, beginning at a stage when researchers may not know the usefulness of their findings, is where the federal government has made a big difference. It normally supplies 25.1% of all medical and health research funding. In comparison, foundations, associations, and societies provide just 1.2%. “All of science philanthropy together, if you add it up, doesn’t come close to the amount of support in the federal budget,” Friend said. The government also plays a large role in building and maintaining complex machinery and large-scale facilities where significant discoveries may be made. Case in point: the synchrotron, a sophisticated x-ray machine used, for example, with CRISPR gene editing technology. The one at Brookhaven National Laboratory costs nearly $1 billion. “An individual could never make these things or have them,” Friend said. “But individuals can go use them because they’ve been built for the overall community.” There’s a compelling upside to such spending: Economists estimate that for every dollar invested in research, the US gets $5-$20Although they can’t match the government’s financial clout, philanthropic organizations are looking for ways to address the extraordinary, nationwide funding gap.in March, 80% of respondents said they were making or considering at least one change to their approach. Many indicated that they were open to ideas like collaborating with other funders, reexamining priorities to address the gaps, and increasing their flexibility in grant-making.. “What’s the range of things they fund as an institution — and what is being defunded? They can step in and support the necessary research.” While many science-focused foundations have yet to comment on how they’re dealing with the new reality, some have gone public: The Kavli Foundation is offering bridge funding to early-career scientists who’ve lost federal support, Friend said. Its relatively small, individual grants are good for up to 2 years. The Spencer Foundation — along with the Kapor Foundation, the William T. Grant Foundation, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation — has also made bridge funding available:Even before the current crisis, the Kavli Foundation had invited fellow funders to preliminary discussions. That conversation will continue as the foundation works with scientists to shape the projects that receive its support. “The idea is that if you have more resources to focus in a particular area that you think is important, that will accelerate progress,” Friend said. “And it will also accelerate if something doesn’t work out. We have to be prepared for things not working.” Other foundations are also looking for fresh ways to work together. More than 170 philanthropic organizations of all kinds have signed on to afrom the Trust-Based Philanthropy Project. It calls for them to go beyond business as usual — to collaborate, to pool funds, and to be responsive to grantees in a coordinated way. As Salehi sees it, this is essential. “I think the next level up is going to be a higher level of coordination among private funders, comparing notes on who they’re funding, who’s not funding, who’s being left behind,” she said. “Where are the gaps?” Debbie Koenig is a health writer whose work has been published by WebMD, The New York Times, and The Washington Post.Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our
Malignant Breast Neoplasm Breast Carcinoma Grant Genomics Genomic Medicine Malignant Head And Neck Neoplasm Head And Neck Cancer Head And Neck Cancer (HNC) Cancer Malignant Neoplasia Carcinoma Malignant Neoplasm Junior Doctor New Doctor Next Generation Of Physician New Generation Of Physician New Physician Early Career Vaccines Brain Cancer Malignant Brain Neoplasm
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Philadelphia universities have weathered tens of millions of dollars’ worth of cuts to scientific researchThe Trump administration claims to cut nearly $50 million from Philly area-institutions.
Read more »
Philanthropic foundations are offering $1 million to young people with bold climate proposalsYouth-led climate groups are getting a $25 million injection from a funding collaborative. Enlight Foundation President Xin Liu said emerging leaders at the forefront of the crisis are not getting enough philanthropic dollars.
Read more »
Buffett donates $6B in Berkshire stock to 5 foundations: Lifetime giving tops $60BBerkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett announced Friday that he is donating another $6 billion of the company’s stock to the Gates Foundation and four family charities.
Read more »
Warren Buffett announces $6 billion in donations to five foundationsFamed investor Warren Buffett is donating $6 billion worth of his company’s stock to five foundations.
Read more »
Warren Buffett announces $6 billion in donations to five foundationsFamed investor Warren Buffett is donating $6 billion worth of his company’s stock to five foundations. That brings the total he has given to them since 2006 to roughly $60 billion, based on their value when received. Buffett said late Friday that the shares of Berkshire Hathaway will be delivered on Monday.
Read more »
Warren Buffett announces $6 billion in donations to five foundationsFamed investor Warren Buffett is donating $6 billion worth of his company’s stock to five foundations.
Read more »