A three-judge panel from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has declared a federal law prohibiting licensed gun dealers from selling handguns to individuals under 21 years old as unconstitutional. The ruling, written by Judge Edith Hollan Jones, cites the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation as the basis for the decision. Everytown for Gun Safety, an organization affiliated with Mike Bloomberg, criticized the ruling, calling it 'reckless' and urging the federal government to appeal the decision.
Mike Bloomberg-affiliated Everytown for Gun Safety threw a tantum Thursday after a three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a handgun purchase ban for 18-20 year-olds is “unconstitutional.”The three judge panel consisted of Judge Edith Hollan Jones, a Ronald Reagan appointee; Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, a George W. Bush appointee; and Judge Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale, a George H.W. Bush appointee.
Jones wrote for the majority, noting, “In sum……from selling or delivering handguns to adults under the age of twenty-one. and their attendant regulations are unconstitutional in light of our Nation’s historic tradition of firearm regulation.”, “RECKLESS: The Fifth Circuit ruled that the federal law prohibiting licensed gun dealers from selling handguns to individuals under 21 is unconstitutional.
Carter did not mention that many of the “teens” for whom gun violence is prevalent are gang-age “teens” in cities like Baltimore, Chicago, Memphis, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC., a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio, a member of Gun Owners of America, a Pulsar Night Vision pro-staffer, and the director of global marketing for Lone Star Hunts.
Calls to Recognize Jordan as De Facto Palestinian State Increase Following Trump’s Proposal for Gazan Relocation NTSB Chair: Abnormal Staffing in Reagan Control Tower ‘Not New to Us’, There’s Been ‘Low Staffing’ Elsewhere
GUN CONTROL APPEALS COURT FIFTH CIRCUIT CONSTITUTIONALITY FIREARMS
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Sixth Circuit Court Rules Against FCC on Net NeutralityThe Sixth Circuit US Court of Appeals has ruled that the FCC lacks the authority to enforce net neutrality rules. This decision stems from a recent reinterpretation of legal doctrine by the Supreme Court, which now allows for individual judges to determine agency interpretations.
Read more »
Sixth Circuit Court Rules Against Net NeutralityThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) cannot reinstate net neutrality rules, citing last year's Supreme Court decision that limited the agency's authority. The court classified broadband as an 'information service' rather than a 'telecommunications service,' which is more heavily regulated.
Read more »
6th Circuit Court Strikes Down Net Neutrality RulesThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit has overturned the Federal Communication Commission's Net Neutrality rules, handing a victory to phone and cable companies. The ruling has been criticized for its flawed reasoning and potential to harm internet users.
Read more »
Court Strikes Down Biden's Net Neutrality Rules, Citing Supreme Court DecisionThe Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Biden administration rules aimed at preventing internet providers from favoring specific apps or websites. This decision ends a decades-long fight for net neutrality, raising concerns about the future of consumer protections. The court's reliance on the recent Supreme Court ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises, which weakens the deference given to regulatory agencies, signals a potential shift in how courts interpret policies across various sectors.
Read more »
Appeals Court Rules Against DACA, Setting Up Potential Supreme Court ShowdownA federal appeals court dealt a blow to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, ruling against an Obama-era policy that shielded young immigrants who arrived in the U.S. illegally as children. The decision, which bars the federal government from accepting new DACA applications, could lead to another Supreme Court battle over the program's future.
Read more »
Sixth Circuit Strikes Down Federal Net Neutrality RulesThe Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lacks the authority to impose net neutrality rules on internet service providers (ISPs). The decision, influenced by the Supreme Court's recent rejection of the Chevron deference doctrine, overturns previous FCC efforts to classify ISPs as common carriers and prevent them from discriminating against internet traffic.
Read more »