The last-minute legal challenge from JohnFetterman seeks to override a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that could disqualify thousands of ballots in the state, potentially swinging election results.
to prohibit counties from notifying voters whose ballots were rejected due to the lack of a correct date or other small technical errors, but some Pennsylvania counties have still declined to release information on how many ballots have been rejected and opted against informing impacted voters.
"Thousands of Pennsylvanians could be disenfranchised through no fault of their own because they understandably relied on the fact that their vote would count even if they did not write a date on the outside envelope of their mail-in or absentee ballot, an error that disproportionately impacts senior citizen voters," All Voting Is Local Pennsylvania wrote in a"This mass disenfranchisement of blameless voters runs directly counter to the well-established principle that election...
"I encourage all counties to communicate with voters who have submitted ballots with minor but potentially disqualifying errors as soon as possible and allow them to address those errors so their voices can be heard," Wolf said in a statement Sunday. More than a million Pennsylvanians submitted absentee or mail-in ballots ahead of Election Day in a state that features several high-profile and consequential races, including one that could decide which party controls the U.S. Senate.
"On Monday, the line to cast a replacement vote at City Hall snaked outside and into the building's courtyard as volunteers supplied snacks and bottled water," the newspaper added.Our work is licensed under Creative Commons . Feel free to republish and share widely.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
California Supreme Court: Who's Running In The Nov. 8 General Election And Why It MattersUnlike the U.S. Supreme Court, California’s highest court is more obscure and rarely issues polarizing opinions.
Read more »
Pennsylvania court rejects GOP push to stop fixing mail-in ballots with incorrect datesA Pennsylvania judge dealt Republicans in the state a legal loss in a case on whether it is illegal to inspect ballots for errors and help voters fix them.
Read more »
Justice Jackson issues her first Supreme Court opinionIn her dissent, Jackson wrote that she would have ordered a new look at Chinn’s case “because his life is on the line and given the substantial likelihood that the suppressed records wo…
Read more »
New Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in dissent, issues first Supreme Court opinionNew Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has issued her first Supreme Court opinion.
Read more »
Supreme Court seems ready to hasten challenges to federal agenciesThe Supreme Court hears arguments in two cases focused on the reach of agencies like the SEC and FTC, about whether businesses and individuals subject to enforcement action by either agency can go directly to federal court with their complaints.
Read more »
Supreme Court won't wade into dispute over prosecutor testifying at trial | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up the appeal of a man from Louisiana who says he was denied the right to a fair trial when prosecutors called the assistant district attorney -- who presented the case to the grand jury -- to the witness stand.
Read more »