WASHINGTON, DC (BLOOMBERG) - Twitter and Facebook have both sparked the ire of Donald Trump, but the social networks have taken nearly opposite approaches to politics and the president.. Read more at straitstimes.com.
WASHINGTON, DC - Twitter and Facebook have both sparked the ire of Donald Trump, but the social networks have taken nearly opposite approaches to politics and the President.
Mr Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder and chief executive officer, is fond of saying that Facebook shouldn't be"the arbiter of truth". That Facebook and Twitter are treating political speech differently is likely no accident, considering the vast differences in their business models and policy risks, experts said. In recent years, Facebook has shifted some of its policies to avoid complaints from conservatives that it's biased. And as it woos important Republicans who have Mr Trump's ear, it has angered Democrats with some of its policy decisions.
Twitter, by contrast, is a much smaller company and can act without fear of the antitrust hammer. That gives it more wiggle room to take positions that could upset the party in power, and also a motive to distinguish itself from its bigger rivals."Nobody is going to accuse Twitter of being a dominant social media platform" or of monopolising online advertising, Feld said.
The contretemps - and the threat of losing that cherished legal shield - had Mr Zuckerberg taking to Mr Trump's favourite news outlet to do damage control."I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn't be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online," Mr Zuckerberg said in an interview with Fox News.
Facebook took a different approach. Mr Trump shared the same mail-in ballots post on his Facebook page, but the company said it didn't violate its standards. Facebook's policy says it won't take down false content from politicians except in certain instances, such as posts that spread harmful coronavirus misinformation or encourage voter suppression.
PELOSI VIDEO Democrats criticised the company last year for failing to take down a manipulated video of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, which showed her slurring her words, suggesting she was impaired during an appearance. Facebook belatedly labelled the video as false, limiting its spread, but the company left up the content.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Twitter's fact-check label prompts Trump threat to shut down social media companiesU.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to regulate or shut down social media companies for stifling conservative voices, a day after ...
Read more »
Trump's executive order targets political bias at Twitter and Facebook - draftU.S. President Donald Trump is expected to order a review of a law that has long protected Twitter, Facebook and Alphabet's Google from being ...
Read more »
Facebook's Zuckerberg says government censoring social media not the 'right reflex'Facebook Inc's Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg, commenting on U.S. President Donald Trump's threats against social media companies, said ...
Read more »
Football: Serie A's Bologna face quarantine threat with potential positive virus caseSerie A club Bologna announced on Wednesday a member of their coaching staff might have tested positive for coronavirus which could lead to ...
Read more »
Future of English women's game faces threat due to COVID-19 says studyREUTERS: The future of English women's soccer faces an unprecedented threat as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and decisive action must be taken ...
Read more »
Commentary: The US reopens for business but families are reluctant to spend – an urgent warning for countries easing COVID-19 restrictionsReopening the economy is no panacea for businesses facing the threat of bankruptcy if adjustment to the ‘new normal’ is not forthcoming, says NUS ...
Read more »