Beyond the Breaking News

Congress to Vote on New Lebanon War Powers Resolution as Israel's Occupation Threatens to Blow Up Iran-US Peace Deal

Us-Congress News

Congress to Vote on New Lebanon War Powers Resolution as Israel's Occupation Threatens to Blow Up Iran-US Peace Deal
War-Powers-ResolutionRashida-TlaibJust-Foreign-Policy

​'This vote is effectively a proxy vote on the Iran deal,' an anti-war activist told Common Dreams. 'Members who vote no are functionally prioritizing continued Israeli operations in Lebanon over the prospects of a deal.'

Congress to Vote on New Lebanon War Powers Resolution as Israel's Occupation Threatens to Blow Up Iran-US Peace Deal "This vote is effectively a proxy vote on the Iran deal," an anti-war activist told Common Dreams.

"Members who vote no are functionally prioritizing continued Israeli operations in Lebanon over the prospects of a deal. " As Israel's continued assault on Lebanon threatens to derail peace negotiations between the Trump administration and Iran, the US House of Representatives is expected to hold another vote on Tuesday on a war powers resolution that could halt American support for Israel's attacks. , introduced in early June by Rep. Rashida Tlaib , would direct President Donald Trump to halt US military involvement in "hostilities" connected to Israel's attacks on Lebanon, which have killed more than 4,000 people and led to the forced displacement of more than 1.2 million residents. It is the second such resolution to be put to a vote in the House this month. H.Con.

Res. 84, also introduced by Tlaib, wasafter Democratic leadership declined to endorse it—since it did not include a carve-out allowing the US to continue coordinating actions against Hezbollah with the Lebanese military—but still received support from 91 Democrats, plus Rep. Thomas Massie .of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries , Whip Katherine Clark , and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar , is expected to fare even better. The anti-war group Just Foreign Policy told Common Dreams that between 160 and 210 Democrats could now vote in favor of the measure. Even in the best-case scenario, this would still require at least seven GOP defectors in addition to Massie. But Erik Sperling, Just Foreign Policy's executive director, said the fact that the vote was happening at all was still tremendously significant.

"This is only the second vote Lebanon on the floor of Congress in history," he said. "It was already one of the most significant things imaginable that we'd even have a vote on it, much less have two in a month.

" Adding to the significance is the fact that Israel's actions in Lebanon have become the primary obstacle to Trump's efforts to end the war in Iran.earlier this month calls for a halt to military operations "on all fronts," including Lebanon, and the Iranian delegation has repeatedly insisted that there is no deal without an Israeli withdrawal.on his defiance of the agreement, stating that Israel would not withdraw "as long as I am prime minister. " Defense Minister Israel Katz added there had been "no American demand for Israel to withdraw.

" This is despite Trump's public and private fuming at Israel for derailing his desperate efforts to back out of the conflict, which ison Friday that is supposed to set up a path for the Lebanese army to take over so-called "pilot zones" in southern Lebanon that are currently controlled by Israel. But in order for Israel to fully withdraw, it has demanded that Hezbollah fully disarm, which the group has On the ground, there is little sign the deal is being implemented.

Since Friday, Israel has conducted several strikes both inside the occupation zone andWhile members of House Democratic leadership have said that the US is "not currently engaged in hostilities in Lebanon," supporters of Tlaib's measure have noted that even without boots on the ground, the US isin Israel's attacks. Trump has reportedly given a "green light" to multiple operations, and Israel has extensively relied on US intelligence.

Janet Abou-Elias, a researcher at the Democratizing Foreign Policy Project at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told Common Dreams earlier this month that ending US coordination with Israel would significantly hamper its ability to continue its occupation of Lebanon.on Monday that an end to Israel's occupation of Lebanon was an “essential prerequisite” for an end to the war with the US, the anti-war coalition on Capitol Hill has said the urgency of passing Tlaib's resolution is only continuing to grow.

"This vote is effectively a proxy vote on the Iran deal," Sperling said. "Any member who genuinely wants a negotiated end to the Iran conflict should be voting yes. Members who vote no are functionally prioritizing continued Israeli operations in Lebanon over the prospects of a deal.

" It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements.

No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform.

To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed.

When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going.

At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay.

Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. As Israel's continued assault on Lebanon threatens to derail peace negotiations between the Trump administration and Iran, the US House of Representatives is expected to hold another vote on Tuesday on a war powers resolution that could halt American support for Israel's attacks.

, introduced in early June by Rep. Rashida Tlaib , would direct President Donald Trump to halt US military involvement in "hostilities" connected to Israel's attacks on Lebanon, which have killed more than 4,000 people and led to the forced displacement of more than 1.2 million residents. It is the second such resolution to be put to a vote in the House this month.

H.Con. Res. 84, also introduced by Tlaib, wasafter Democratic leadership declined to endorse it—since it did not include a carve-out allowing the US to continue coordinating actions against Hezbollah with the Lebanese military—but still received support from 91 Democrats, plus Rep. Thomas Massie .of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries , Whip Katherine Clark , and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar , is expected to fare even better. The anti-war group Just Foreign Policy told Common Dreams that between 160 and 210 Democrats could now vote in favor of the measure. Even in the best-case scenario, this would still require at least seven GOP defectors in addition to Massie.

But Erik Sperling, Just Foreign Policy's executive director, said the fact that the vote was happening at all was still tremendously significant.

"This is only the second vote Lebanon on the floor of Congress in history," he said. "It was already one of the most significant things imaginable that we'd even have a vote on it, much less have two in a month.

" Adding to the significance is the fact that Israel's actions in Lebanon have become the primary obstacle to Trump's efforts to end the war in Iran.earlier this month calls for a halt to military operations "on all fronts," including Lebanon, and the Iranian delegation has repeatedly insisted that there is no deal without an Israeli withdrawal.on his defiance of the agreement, stating that Israel would not withdraw "as long as I am prime minister. " Defense Minister Israel Katz added there had been "no American demand for Israel to withdraw.

" This is despite Trump's public and private fuming at Israel for derailing his desperate efforts to back out of the conflict, which ison Friday that is supposed to set up a path for the Lebanese army to take over so-called "pilot zones" in southern Lebanon that are currently controlled by Israel. But in order for Israel to fully withdraw, it has demanded that Hezbollah fully disarm, which the group has On the ground, there is little sign the deal is being implemented.

Since Friday, Israel has conducted several strikes both inside the occupation zone andWhile members of House Democratic leadership have said that the US is "not currently engaged in hostilities in Lebanon," supporters of Tlaib's measure have noted that even without boots on the ground, the US isin Israel's attacks. Trump has reportedly given a "green light" to multiple operations, and Israel has extensively relied on US intelligence.

Janet Abou-Elias, a researcher at the Democratizing Foreign Policy Project at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told Common Dreams earlier this month that ending US coordination with Israel would significantly hamper its ability to continue its occupation of Lebanon.on Monday that an end to Israel's occupation of Lebanon was an “essential prerequisite” for an end to the war with the US, the anti-war coalition on Capitol Hill has said the urgency of passing Tlaib's resolution is only continuing to grow.

"This vote is effectively a proxy vote on the Iran deal," Sperling said. "Any member who genuinely wants a negotiated end to the Iran conflict should be voting yes. Members who vote no are functionally prioritizing continued Israeli operations in Lebanon over the prospects of a deal.

"As Israel's continued assault on Lebanon threatens to derail peace negotiations between the Trump administration and Iran, the US House of Representatives is expected to hold another vote on Tuesday on a war powers resolution that could halt American support for Israel's attacks. , introduced in early June by Rep. Rashida Tlaib , would direct President Donald Trump to halt US military involvement in "hostilities" connected to Israel's attacks on Lebanon, which have killed more than 4,000 people and led to the forced displacement of more than 1.2 million residents. It is the second such resolution to be put to a vote in the House this month. H.Con.

Res. 84, also introduced by Tlaib, wasafter Democratic leadership declined to endorse it—since it did not include a carve-out allowing the US to continue coordinating actions against Hezbollah with the Lebanese military—but still received support from 91 Democrats, plus Rep. Thomas Massie .of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries , Whip Katherine Clark , and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar , is expected to fare even better. The anti-war group Just Foreign Policy told Common Dreams that between 160 and 210 Democrats could now vote in favor of the measure. Even in the best-case scenario, this would still require at least seven GOP defectors in addition to Massie. But Erik Sperling, Just Foreign Policy's executive director, said the fact that the vote was happening at all was still tremendously significant.

"This is only the second vote Lebanon on the floor of Congress in history," he said. "It was already one of the most significant things imaginable that we'd even have a vote on it, much less have two in a month.

" Adding to the significance is the fact that Israel's actions in Lebanon have become the primary obstacle to Trump's efforts to end the war in Iran.earlier this month calls for a halt to military operations "on all fronts," including Lebanon, and the Iranian delegation has repeatedly insisted that there is no deal without an Israeli withdrawal.on his defiance of the agreement, stating that Israel would not withdraw "as long as I am prime minister. " Defense Minister Israel Katz added there had been "no American demand for Israel to withdraw.

" This is despite Trump's public and private fuming at Israel for derailing his desperate efforts to back out of the conflict, which ison Friday that is supposed to set up a path for the Lebanese army to take over so-called "pilot zones" in southern Lebanon that are currently controlled by Israel. But in order for Israel to fully withdraw, it has demanded that Hezbollah fully disarm, which the group has On the ground, there is little sign the deal is being implemented.

Since Friday, Israel has conducted several strikes both inside the occupation zone andWhile members of House Democratic leadership have said that the US is "not currently engaged in hostilities in Lebanon," supporters of Tlaib's measure have noted that even without boots on the ground, the US isin Israel's attacks. Trump has reportedly given a "green light" to multiple operations, and Israel has extensively relied on US intelligence.

Janet Abou-Elias, a researcher at the Democratizing Foreign Policy Project at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told Common Dreams earlier this month that ending US coordination with Israel would significantly hamper its ability to continue its occupation of Lebanon.on Monday that an end to Israel's occupation of Lebanon was an “essential prerequisite” for an end to the war with the US, the anti-war coalition on Capitol Hill has said the urgency of passing Tlaib's resolution is only continuing to grow.

"This vote is effectively a proxy vote on the Iran deal," Sperling said. "Any member who genuinely wants a negotiated end to the Iran conflict should be voting yes. Members who vote no are functionally prioritizing continued Israeli operations in Lebanon over the prospects of a deal.

" The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%.

Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.

Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising.

No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in?

GooglePlease follow us on Google to support us
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

commondreams /  🏆 530. in US

War-Powers-Resolution Rashida-Tlaib Just-Foreign-Policy Israel Iran-War Lebanon

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Israel, Lebanon Sign U.S.‑Mediated Framework, ‘First Step’ Toward PeaceIsrael, Lebanon Sign U.S.‑Mediated Framework, ‘First Step’ Toward PeacePrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the deal as “a major achievement” for Israel and “a major blow to Iran.”
Read more »

Iran's World Cup team eliminated after tight group stage matches amidst US-Iran tensionsIran's World Cup team eliminated after tight group stage matches amidst US-Iran tensionsIran's national football team was eliminated from the World Cup after finishing third in Group G, with three points from draws against Belgium, New Zealand, and Egypt. The elimination was confirmed when Austria scored a late equalizer against Algeria, preventing Iran from advancing via tiebreakers. The tournament was marked by political tensions between the US and Iran, including travel restrictions, visa denials, and protests by Iranian Americans. Iran's request to move its base camp to Tijuana was granted, and the team thanked the people of Mexico after elimination.
Read more »

Iran Targets US with Psychological Warfare, Escalates Maritime Conflicts Amid Regional TensionsIran Targets US with Psychological Warfare, Escalates Maritime Conflicts Amid Regional TensionsIran has launched a psychological warfare campaign aimed at manipulating American public opinion and embarrassing former President Trump, according to experts. This comes amid escalating maritime confrontations in the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran targeted shipping and launched drones toward Kuwait and Bahrain, prompting US strikes on Iranian missile and drone storage sites. Commercial shipping operations in the Gulf have been disrupted, with vessels anchored due to heightened risk. Meanwhile, Iran began moving millions of barrels of crude oil from Kharg Island, signaling a restart of exports. Diplomatic efforts continue with a framework deal between Israel and Lebanon, though experts warn Iran may attempt to sabotage it. Additional reports cover Gulf countries condemning Iran's drone attack on Bahrain, Farage's comments on UK migration, a Venezuelan earthquake death toll, and other global headlines.
Read more »

US-Iran Talks to Resume Amid Gulf Tensions, Iran Questions ParticipationUS-Iran Talks to Resume Amid Gulf Tensions, Iran Questions ParticipationPresident Trump announced talks with Iran will resume Tuesday in Qatar despite recent attacks in the Gulf. Iran has not confirmed participation, while officials discuss an interim peace deal, deconfliction measures, and Strait of Hormuz reopening.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-08-13 06:45:42