Column: How Democrats could curb a conservative SCOTUS without court-packing - Frankel

United States News News

Column: How Democrats could curb a conservative SCOTUS without court-packing - Frankel
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 52 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 97%

President Donald Trump and Republicans in the U.S. Senate are barreling forward with plans to lock down conservative control of the U.S. Supreme Court for decades to come. The president has said he will announce his nominee on Saturday to fill the seat of Justice Ruth Bader...

NEW YORK - President Donald Trump and Republicans in the U.S. Senate are barreling forward with plans to lock down conservative control of the U.S. Supreme Court for decades to come. The president has said he will announce his nominee on Saturday to fill the seat of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Republicans have sketched out plans to vote on the president’s nominee before the Nov. 3 election.

According to an upcoming California Law Review article, The Supreme Court and the 117th Congress, Congress can home in on how the Supreme Court decides which cases to hear.

But the rule of four, as Jennings and Acharya explain in their paper, is not even a formal procedure, much less an actual law. “The ‘rule of four’ is not a command of Congress,” wrote Justice Felix Frankfurter in a 1957 dissenting opinion. “It is a working rule devised by the court as a practical mode of determining that a case is deserving of review.”

If a Democratic Congress were to decide to add justices to restore the court’s ideological balance, it would just have to change one word in the operative 1866 law specifying the size of the court.Alternatively, wrote Jennings and Acharya, Congress could attempt to restrict the kinds of cases that the Supreme Court is entitled to hear. The Constitution, they explained, says only that the Supreme Court must hear cases of “original jurisdiction,” such as disputes between states.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Reuters /  🏆 2. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Column: Maybe it's time to expand the Supreme CourtColumn: Maybe it's time to expand the Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court originally had six justices; at one point it had 10. It's been nine since just after the Civil War, but if Trump rams a new conservative justice through before the election, maybe Democrats should expand the court to restore balance.
Read more »

Column: Ginsburg's death makes a new court-packing scheme much more urgentColumn: Ginsburg's death makes a new court-packing scheme much more urgent'Expanding the court to 13 justices or even more wouldn’t guarantee a liberal bench in perpetuity, of course. But it might prevent any single president from drastically remaking the court.' Columnist hiltzikm explains:
Read more »

Adam Met of AJR on What Makes an Effective Modern Protest Song (Guest Column)Adam Met of AJR on What Makes an Effective Modern Protest Song (Guest Column)
Read more »

Column: A bike tour reveals hidden Latino history in downtown Los AngelesColumn: A bike tour reveals hidden Latino history in downtown Los AngelesUCLA Chicano Studies professor Marissa López, an avid cyclist, worked with the Los Angeles Explorers Club to turn a project that tells the hidden histories of Latino Los Angeles into a 70-minute self-guided tour.
Read more »

Column: Scam utility calls are the latest pandemic ploy to target your cashColumn: Scam utility calls are the latest pandemic ploy to target your cashUtilities nationwide and throughout California are warning customers to ignore fraudulent calls threatening a service shutdown if you don't pay some cash.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-04-17 21:49:40