“This is the time for Coloradans to ask themselves, ‘How much do we care about our kids?’ And to figure out what we need to do as proper and adjusted investments,” state Rep…
Kevin Vick, president of the Colorado Education Association, speaks during a news conference announcing a bill that would put a change to the TABOR spending cap up to a vote on the November ballot at the Colorado State Capitol’s west steps in Denver on Jan.
22, 2026. A pair of measures that Democrats are aiming to place on the November ballot would significantly alter the foundation of Colorado’s tax code, upending the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights.— would represent a fundamental change to the state’s rigid tax structure. Taken together, the measures ask voters to reimagine how taxes are collected and spent. The potential benefits would go to education, in particular, as well as to health care, child care and a slew of other state services that Democrats say have been shortchanged by a system that has been largely untouched for nearly 20 years. The measures would also mean tax increases for the wealthiest Coloradans, changes to the slew of tax credits that draw on the state’s surplus tax collections, and a potential end to the sales tax refunds that the state frequently issues with tax returns. The two ballot measures, one a potential referred measure backed by the Colorado Education Association and the other an outside initiative by the progressive Bell Policy Center, wouldn’t directly compete with each other, backers said. But the two proposals would ask voters big, similar questions as Democrats try to solve what they see as major structural problems with state finances. “They both attack the problem in different ways,” said Kevin Vick, the president of the CEA, the largest teachers union in the state, at a rally Thursday outside the state Capitol to support changing the state spending cap. “They don’t compete with each other in ways they attack the issue.” But he acknowledged: “We’re still working through what having both of them on the ballot may mean for voters.”TABOR, which Colorado voters adopted in 1992, restricts growth in government using a formula that factors in population growth and inflation. The CEA proposal would ask voters to exempt the state share of K-12 education funding from that cap — in effect giving the state a $4.5 billion buffer before it needs to refund money — while promising to increase education funding by at least 2% per year. The buffer could last for years.from the legislature predicts the state will be $501 million over the cap in the next fiscal year, which starts July 1, and $807 million over in the following fiscal year.Kelly Johnson, an educator from Delta High School, speaks during a Colorado Education Association news conference announcing a bill that would put the TABOR spending cap up to a vote on the November ballot at the Colorado State Capitol's west steps in Denver on Jan. 22, 2026. Democrats, who outnumber Republicans in the legislature by a ratio of nearly 2-to-1, frequently argue that the TABOR cap unnecessarily hamstrings the state in paying for public services, from roads to health care. The proposal, which has yet to be officially filed but has been talked about since the legislative session began Jan. 14, could land on ballots with a simple majority of support from lawmakers. “This is something that hasn’t changed in decades,” said Sen. Jeff Bridges, a Greenwood Village Democrat who will sponsor the measure. He said it was time to take the issue to voters and give them the choice of keeping the spending cap or raising it to enable the state to “lower class sizes, increase teacher pay and make sure our kids are ready for the workforce.” “This is the time for Coloradans to ask themselves, ‘How much do we care about our kids?’ And to figure out what we need to do as proper and adjusted investments,” added state Rep. Jennifer Bacon, a Denver Democrat who plans to sponsor the bill when it’s introduced. “One thing I do know about Coloradans is we do care about our kids, and we care about our kids across the state.”, or the budgeting maneuver that long allowed the state to fund K-12 education below the constitutionally required amount. The legislature also passedWhile state education funding is no longer lower than the constitution requires, advocates note that it’s still at inflation-adjusted 1989 levels — a time before families expected Chromebooks and mental health services.“For more than 30 years, an outdated and arbitrary revenue cap has kept our state funding tied up so tightly that we can’t invest in public education and keep up with student needs,” Vick said. The measure, if adopted by voters in roughly the shape envisioned by its backers, would immediately boost public education funding by between $90 million and $100 million, Vick said, with annual increases after that. It wouldn’t be “the final piece” to achieving full funding of education, he said, “but we need to provide some relief now and get this increase in funding started, so we’re not losing generations of kids to this crisis.” Aspiring educator Amaya Mills, top, works with first graders in a reading class at Ponderosa Elementary School in Aurora, Colorado, on Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2024. The change would also free up potentially billions of dollars in flush years for the state to spend on other priorities, like— and keep the money from being directly returned to Coloradans via the sales tax refund that’s typically issued with tax filings or through the litany of tax credits lawmakers have passed recently, including the Family Affordability Tax Credit. That oneGov. Jared Polis, who often advocates for cutting taxes, hasn’t officially weighed in on the CEA’s outlines for the measure, though his signature wouldn’t be necessary for the legislature to refer it to the voters. In an interview with The Denver Post earlier this month, he signaled some caution because, as it stands now, there are simply some years when the state doesn’t hit the TABOR cap — meaning there wouldn’t be extra money anyway. “Generally speaking, two years out of every 10 or so — usually because of a recession, but it could be because of federal tax changes — we don’t have a TABOR surplus,” Polis said. “So I would just want to highlight that if you’re talking about base spending, it might work seven or eight years out of 10.” Kristi Burton Brown, the vice president of the Advance Colorado Institute, a conservative think tank that often opposes measures it sees as an attack on TABOR, said the math doesn’t add up for this proposal. Raising the spending cap by $4.5 billion, while earmarking only $100 million of the increased spending capacity for education, could result in the creation of a “slush fund,” she warned — while it also “basically destroys the possibility of ever getting TABOR refunds again.”Voters have rejected recent attempts to adjust the TABOR cap. Proposition CC, with its promise to dedicate funding to education and roads,Backers argue this new proposal asks voters a more direct question — Can the state keep money to pay for education? — than those failed efforts. Burton Brown argues the earlier questions were direct enough, and directly answered by voters with a resounding “No” when the electorate saw them as end-runs around TABOR. “While voters like those things , I don’t think voters are willing to give up their TABOR refunds, give up the cap on state revenue to do that,” Burton Brown said.Income tax measure would change flat rate The Bell Policy Center, a progressive think tank in Denver, recently won preliminary approval from the state’s title board for its proposed ballot measure. It would change the state’s income tax code from a flat-rate tax — where every Coloradan pays the same percentage of their income, currently 4.4% — to a graduated rate where lower-income people pay a smaller percentage in taxes while wealthier Coloradans pay a higher rate. The center’s proposal would result in lower-income taxpayers paying a lower tax rate than they do today, while wealthier taxpayers would pay more, with the rate increasing with each income bracket. The first $25,000 a person earns would be taxed at 3.7%; income over $25,000 but less than $100,000 would be taxed at 4.2%; and income between $100,000 and $500,000 would be taxed at 4.4%. Only money earned beyond that $500,000 mark would be taxed at a higher rate of between 7.4% and 8.4%. For the vast majority of Coloradans — an estimated 97% — the proposal would mean a tax cut, Bell Policy Center President Chris deGruy Kennedy said. It would also earmark money collected over the current TABOR cap to be spent on child care, health care and education. The proposal still needs final approval from the title board — including facing likely challenges from Burton Brown’s group — before backers can begin gathering signatures. “This is not just a lefty thing. This is the way taxes are done in more than half the states of this country,” including Republican states, deGruy Kennedy said. “We just want to restore an income tax system that relieves undue pressure on the lowest-income Coloradans.” The Bell measure and the teachers union’s measure would propose changes to different parts of the tax code. Supporters of each are keenly aware that they’d be asking big questions of voters. DeGruy Kennedy said the two measures would build off one another — not compete — and “allow the state to make very, very meaningful investments.” Voters have a history of deciding each ballot measure separately, but it’s an open question as to how the electorate would see these two interplaying, he said. But for Burton Brown and other conservatives, the proposals would amount to “completely wrecking the tax code that people have really relied on and really liked for a long time in Colorado.” She warned of the additional strain it would put on a precarious state economy. “Obviously, if either gets on , they need to be fought with serious campaigns against them so voters aren’t deceived by bad messaging that doesn’t give them the full picture,” Burton Brown said.While those efforts play out, Democratic lawmakers are also working on several measures to further tweak the state’s tax code. They want to close or limit business-friendly tax incentives in the hopes of bolstering the rest of the budget. The package is still being drafted, and it’s unclear how much money the proposals might raise. But lawmakers say they intend to direct that money toward what may become a new program to support families, in a similar vein to the “We know that families are struggling right now, and do we want to give corporations more tax breaks? Or do we want to be able to put money in the hands of struggling families?” said Rep. Yara Zokaie, a Fort Collins Democrat involved in drafting the bills. “I think it’s important that we put money here.” One bill would eliminate a sales tax exemption that the state applies to software purchased online . Another, sponsored by Zokaie, would further limit deductions that corporations can take on executive compensation and a tax provision that lets companies deduct current-year losses from future years’ income. The third bill would decouple the state from four federal tax incentives that were created or expanded under the tax-and-spend bill passed by Congress and signed by President Donald Trump in July, said Rep. Lorena Garcia, an Adams County Democrat. The package would partially build on tax reforms lawmakers began to pass last year, both during the regular session and the budget-bandaging special session in August.this month, Polis made his own pitch for tax reform — by inviting lawmakers to support an income tax cut.Denver suburb faces sudden $42 million fiscal hole as it reckons with ruling finding a city tax violated TABOR Trump factor, budget cuts and Gov. Polis’ final year: Here’s what to expect in the Colorado legislature’s 2026 session Study says new Colorado family tax credits cut child poverty by nearly 41%. Can the state afford to keep them going? Colorado Medicaid cuts to home caregiver program would put strain on families that ‘are already struggling’ Speaking to reporters afterward, the governor gestured at the coming tax package from his fellow Democrats and indicated he’d support it if lawmakers included another “significant” income tax reduction, on top of others passed by voters in recent years. “This would be part of a comprehensive tax-reform package,” he said. “So, reducing special interest tax loopholes, using some of the proceeds for reducing the income tax and other proceeds for other progressive tax credits.” He later elaborated that he would want any tax package to include a broader tax cut — such as to income tax rates, property taxes or sales taxes — along with targeted programs, like the Family Affordabilty Tax Credit. To pass the family affordability credit in 2024, legislators begrudgingly agreed to an income tax cut sought by Polis that’s conditional, depending on the size of TABOR surpluses.“I’m always happy to negotiate with the governor,” Garcia said. “I will never give in to an income tax cut. Period.” In a statement Thursday, Polis spokesman Eric Maruyama said the governor “looks forward to working with the legislature to help Coloradans keep more of their hard-earned money, close corporate tax loopholes, and streamline our tax code.” “While it’s early in session, the governor’s office is in active conversations with sponsors over what it would take to get the governor on board,” Maruyama wrote, “and he encourages everyone to keep an open mind on saving people money.” ICE investigates after Colorado group says agents left 'death cards' in arrested immigrants' abandoned carsColorado weather: Arctic cold, chance of snow at Denver Broncos playoff game Denver marijuana dispensary's licenses revoked after links to interstate drug case, code violations uncoveredDenver Country Club mansion lists for $4M after 9-year renovationFrustrated neighbors sue Colorado concert venue after years of noise complaints
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Judge rules Trump administration must keep funding child care subsidies in Colorado — for nowThe judge said he’d decide later whether the money is to remain in place while a challenge to cutting it off works its way through the courts.
Read more »
Colorado's Film Festival Frenzy: A Cinematic Celebration Before Sundance ArrivesColorado's thriving film scene offers a diverse array of festivals, from the Denver Jewish Film Festival to the Colorado Environmental Film Festival and more. These events showcase various genres, support filmmakers, and contribute to the state's cultural landscape. The upcoming arrival of Sundance in 2027 will further enhance Colorado's reputation as a hub for cinematic creativity.
Read more »
Colorado Ranked Among Worst States for Drivers Due to Safety, Infrastructure, and CostA recent study by WalletHub reveals Colorado as one of the worst states to drive in, highlighting poor infrastructure, high costs, and safety concerns. Factors include traffic congestion, road quality, and vehicle theft rates. The state’s 2025 traffic fatalities totaled 701, a rise from 2024, emphasizing areas needing improvement.
Read more »
Hunter S. Thompson’s death confirmed as suicide, Colorado investigators sayColorado Bureau of Investigation officials on Friday confirmed the 2005 death of renowned author and journalist Hunter S. Thompson was a result of suicide, almost six months after the state started…
Read more »
‘Political retribution’: Democrats blast Trump for putting blue-state funding under microscopeThe Trump administration ramped up efforts to crack down on fraud by ordering a review of federal funding to Democratic-led states.
Read more »
Democrats see hope in plan to crack GOP supermajorities in state legislaturesA top election forecaster projected 15 state legislative chambers, eight of which are held by Republicans, will be competitive this year.
Read more »