Colorado's highest court has ruled that five elephants at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo do not have the legal right to sue for their release. The Nonhuman Rights Project, an animal rights group, had argued that the elephants should be transferred to a sanctuary due to their captivity and potential brain damage. The court stated that elephants are not considered 'persons' under the law and therefore lack the legal standing to bring a habeas corpus claim.
The Afternoon WireAs fire-fanning winds continue, Southern California readies for potential rain and toxic runoffFrom TikTok to Jan. 6, this is what President Trump did on his first day back in officeLiverpool beats Lille to reach Champions League round of 16.
The group argued that the Colorado elephants, born in the wild in Africa, have shown signs of brain damage because the zoo is essentially a prison for such intelligent and social creatures, known to roam for miles a day. It wanted the animals released to one of the two accredited elephant sanctuaries in the United States because the group doesn’t think they can no longer live in the wild.
While welcoming the Colorado court’s ruling, the zoo said it was disappointed there had to be a legal fight over the issue and accused the Nonhuman Rights Project of “abusing court systems” to fundraise.
ELEPHANTS LAW ANIMAL RIGHTS HABEAS CORPUS COLORADO
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Colorado Court Rules Elephants Lack Legal Right to FreedomA Colorado court ruled that five elephants at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo do not have the legal right to pursue their release. The court determined that elephants are not considered persons under the law and therefore lack the standing to file a habeas corpus claim. The Nonhuman Rights Project, an animal rights group, had argued for the elephants' release to sanctuaries, citing concerns about their mental and physical well-being in captivity. The zoo countered that moving the elephants would be detrimental to their welfare.
Read more »
Colorado Court Rules Elephants Lack Legal Standing for FreedomFive elephants at a Colorado zoo are not legally entitled to seek their release, according to a ruling by Colorado's highest court. The court determined that, as elephants are not considered persons, they lack the legal standing to challenge their detention through a habeas corpus claim. This decision comes after a similar case involving an elephant at the Bronx Zoo, where the Nonhuman Rights Project, an animal rights group, argued for the animals' release to sanctuaries, citing potential brain damage caused by captivity.
Read more »
Colorado Supreme Court Rules Elephants Not Eligible for Habeas CorpusThe Colorado Supreme Court has affirmed a lower court's decision, ruling that elephants are not eligible for habeas corpus protection, a legal remedy typically applied to individuals facing unlawful detention. The Nonhuman Rights Project, a group advocating for animal rights, had filed a lawsuit on behalf of five elephants at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo, seeking their release to a sanctuary.
Read more »
Colorado Supreme Court Rules Elephants Can't Sue for FreedomThe Colorado Supreme Court ruled that five elephants at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo cannot pursue a legal case for their release. The court determined that since elephants are not considered 'persons' under the law, they lack the legal standing to file a habeas corpus claim.
Read more »
Court Strikes Down Biden's Net Neutrality Rules, Citing Supreme Court DecisionThe Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Biden administration rules aimed at preventing internet providers from favoring specific apps or websites. This decision ends a decades-long fight for net neutrality, raising concerns about the future of consumer protections. The court's reliance on the recent Supreme Court ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises, which weakens the deference given to regulatory agencies, signals a potential shift in how courts interpret policies across various sectors.
Read more »
Appeals Court Rules Against DACA, Setting Up Potential Supreme Court ShowdownA federal appeals court dealt a blow to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, ruling against an Obama-era policy that shielded young immigrants who arrived in the U.S. illegally as children. The decision, which bars the federal government from accepting new DACA applications, could lead to another Supreme Court battle over the program's future.
Read more »