The Colorado Supreme Court has denied a habeas corpus petition filed on behalf of five elephants at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo, ruling that they lack the legal standing to challenge their detention. The court's decision mirrors a similar ruling in a case involving an elephant named Happy at the Bronx Zoo in 2022.
Colorado's highest court ruled Tuesday that elephants, while majestic, do not have the legal standing to pursue their release. The court's decision, made in a case brought by the animal rights group Nonhuman Rights Project, mirrors a similar ruling in 2022 for an elephant named Happy at the Bronx Zoo. Both rulings prevent lawyers from representing the elephants in a legal process called habeas corpus , which allows prisoners to challenge their detention.
The Nonhuman Rights Project had argued that Missy, Kimba, Lucky, LouLou, and Jambo, the elephants residing at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo in Colorado Springs, should be moved to an accredited elephant sanctuary. They claimed the elephants, born in the wild in Africa, were suffering from brain damage due to their confinement in the zoo, which they deemed a prison for such intelligent and social creatures. The group asserted that the elephants' inability to roam freely for miles each day, as they would in the wild, was causing them psychological distress.The Cheyenne Mountain Zoo countered that relocating the elephants, especially at their age, would be cruel and potentially cause unnecessary stress. They argued that the elephants were not accustomed to being in larger herds and lacked the skills or desire to integrate into one. The zoo also cited concerns about potential aggression and social disruption among the elephants if they were introduced to new animals. They maintained that the zoo environment provided adequate care and enrichment for the elephants, despite their limited space. While welcoming the Colorado court's ruling, the zoo expressed disappointment over the legal battle and accused the Nonhuman Rights Project of abusing court systems for fundraising purposes. They claimed the organization's primary goal was to generate donations by sensationalizing legal cases and relentlessly appealing for public support. The Nonhuman Rights Project, however, insisted that the ruling perpetuated injustice and predicted future courts would reject the notion that only humans have the right to liberty. They viewed the case as part of a broader social justice movement challenging the status quo and advocating for the recognition of animal rights. They vowed to continue their fight for the elephants' freedom, despite the setback
ANIMAL RIGHTS HABEAS CORPUS ELEPHANTS COLORADO SUPREME COURT CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOO
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
LA Zoo and Fundraising Arm GLAZA Head to Court Over Future of ZooAfter decades of partnership, the Los Angeles Zoo and its fundraising arm, GLAZA, are embroiled in a legal battle over control of funds and the direction of the zoo. GLAZA, upset over a request for proposals that essentially put its services up for bid, has announced its intent to dissolve its partnership with the zoo.
Read more »
Animal Rights Group Criticizes Colorado Zoo for Treatment of Elderly ElephantsIn Defense of Animals accuses Cheyenne Mountain Zoo of mistreating its five elderly African elephants, known as the 'Golden Girls', due to their small enclosure and forced performance tricks.
Read more »
Colorado Court Rules Elephants Lack Legal Standing for FreedomFive elephants at a Colorado zoo are not legally entitled to seek their release, according to a ruling by Colorado's highest court. The court determined that, as elephants are not considered persons, they lack the legal standing to challenge their detention through a habeas corpus claim. This decision comes after a similar case involving an elephant at the Bronx Zoo, where the Nonhuman Rights Project, an animal rights group, argued for the animals' release to sanctuaries, citing potential brain damage caused by captivity.
Read more »
Colorado professor weighs in on United States Supreme Court hearing on Tiktok banWanya Reese joined the Denver 7 team as a Weekend Morning Anchor and Reporter in July of 2023.
Read more »
Colorado Supreme Court Rules Elephants Not Eligible for Habeas CorpusThe Colorado Supreme Court has affirmed a lower court's decision, ruling that elephants are not eligible for habeas corpus protection, a legal remedy typically applied to individuals facing unlawful detention. The Nonhuman Rights Project, a group advocating for animal rights, had filed a lawsuit on behalf of five elephants at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo, seeking their release to a sanctuary.
Read more »
Colorado Court Rules Elephants Lack Legal Right to FreedomA Colorado court ruled that five elephants at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo do not have the legal right to pursue their release. The court determined that elephants are not considered persons under the law and therefore lack the standing to file a habeas corpus claim. The Nonhuman Rights Project, an animal rights group, had argued for the elephants' release to sanctuaries, citing concerns about their mental and physical well-being in captivity. The zoo countered that moving the elephants would be detrimental to their welfare.
Read more »