Regulators can approve up to 30 neighborhood decarbonization zones. Will poorer neighborhoods get first shot at climate saving energy options?
A natural gas pipeline in Chino Hills State Park on April 21, 2021. The state is planning for up to 30 neighborhoods switching from gas lines to electric energy options. Photo by Lucy Nicholson, Reuters Welcome to CalMatters, the only nonprofit newsroom devoted solely to covering statewide issues that affect all Californians.
Sign up fora commentary forum aiming to broaden our understanding of the state and spotlight Californians directly impacted by policy or its absence. Learn moreCalifornia is finally staring down an uncomfortable fact: we can’t keep pouring money into aging gas pipelines and pretending we’reReplacing a single mile of pipe can cost $3 million to $5 million dollars or more. That money lands in your gas bill.” pilots, where a utility can shut off a local gas line and use the avoided pipeline money to pay for zero-emission alternatives, such as heat pumps, electric water heaters, thermal networks or efficiency upgrades — as long as the clean option is cheaper and the benefits flow first to low-income communities. This is not meant to be a feel-good climate side project. It’s supposed to be a cost-control program with a climate bonus.taking the first step, designating 151 initial priority decarbonization zones across the state. Faced with more than 9,000 census tracts, the commission needed a screening rule. It chose to require that at least 10% of local gas mains be scheduled for replacement for a tract to qualify. The first is participation bias. The commission’s docket system favors communities with the resources to engage in regulatory processes. The result: a map dominated by coastal, civically organized neighborhoods — leaving higher-burdened, inland and Central Valley communities out. If wealthier coastal neighborhoods get ratepayer-funded electrification while inland renters stay on aging gas systems, California accelerates the death spiral SB 1221 was meant to prevent. As affluent households leave gas, pipeline costs are spread across fewer, poorer customers. The second problem is utility incentives. Utilities earn guaranteed returns on gas pipelines but face uncertainty with electrification. PG&E walked away from— despite its own analysis showing savings if they converted gas services to electric — because pipes were the safer financial choice for PG&E, climate goals be damned. SB 1221 partly remedies this by requiring zero-emission alternatives only when they’re cheaper than gas, ensuring utilities are made whole, while empowering the commission to shut down gas segments when two-thirds of property owners agree to electrify. Whether that achieves the bill’s intent for equitable decarbonisation depends entirely on how the commission uses its power. The commission’s update in 2026 should start with a community’s pollution and vulnerability, not with who manages to comment on an obscure docket. CalEnviroScreen is the tool the state uses to identify which neighborhoods are most susceptible to environmental harm. Its full data — and serious outreach to inland communities, the Central Valley, and California’s more than 100 tribal nations — should drive the next map. At the same time, utilities must be required to follow a transparent cost-effectiveness framework and disclose basic project data so the public can see where the billions are going. SB 1221 offers a rare alignment of climate, affordability and equity. That promise will only be realized if regulators resist the path of least resistance and send neighborhood decarbonization first to the communities that need it most — and where it saves the most money.We are independent and nonpartisan.We probe and reveal the actions and inactions of powerful people and institutions, and the consequences that follow.Denise Smith Amos is the California Voices Deputy Editor. Before joining CalMatters she was the editor of the watchdog and accountability team at the Union-Tribune in San Diego. She has been a reporter,...We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary On paper, that approach looks cautious and reasonable. But two problems arise. The first is participation bias. The commission's docket system favors communities with the resources to engage in regulatory processes. The result: a map dominated by coastal, civically organized neighborhoods — leaving higher-burdened, inland and Central Valley communities out. If wealthier coastal neighborhoods get ratepayer-funded electrification while inland renters stay on aging gas systems, California accelerates the death spiral SB 1221 was meant to prevent. As affluent households leave gas, pipeline costs are spread across fewer, poorer customers. The second problem is utility incentives. Utilities earn guaranteed returns on gas pipelines but face uncertainty with electrification. PG&E walked away from Cal State Monterey Bay's electrification project — despite its own analysis showing savings if they converted gas services to electric — because pipes were the safer financial choice for PG&E, climate goals be damned. SB 1221 partly remedies this by requiring zero-emission alternatives only when they’re cheaper than gas, ensuring utilities are made whole, while empowering the commission to shut down gas segments when two-thirds of property owners agree to electrify. Whether that achieves the bill’s intent for equitable decarbonisation depends entirely on how the commission uses its power. The commission’s update in 2026 should start with a community’s pollution and vulnerability, not with who manages to comment on an obscure docket. CalEnviroScreen is the tool the state uses to identify which neighborhoods are most susceptible to environmental harm. Its full data — and serious outreach to inland communities, the Central Valley, and California’s more than 100 tribal nations — should drive the next map. At the same time, utilities must be required to follow a transparent cost-effectiveness framework and disclose basic project data so the public can see where the billions are going. SB 1221 offers a rare alignment of climate, affordability and equity. That promise will only be realized if regulators resist the path of least resistance and send neighborhood decarbonization first to the communities that need it most — and where it saves the most money. This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Pockets of unvaccinated communities are driving measles outbreaks in CaliforniaWhen a possible measles case is identified in California, a phone rings at the local health department and the clock starts ticking.
Read more »
Best things to do this week in Los Angeles and Southern California: March 2-5Laura Hertzfeld's bio on LAist.com.
Read more »
Early morning apartment fire displaces 41, injures 2 in EverettFrank Sumrall is the lead editor for MyNorthwest originally from the North Bay in California.
Read more »
Kevin Kiley to run in California’s redrawn 6th Congressional DistrictU.S. Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) will run in California's carved-up 6th Congressional District, a Democratic-leaning area.
Read more »
California Elementary School Counselor Accused of Child Sex Crimes Made $70,000 on Paid LeaveSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »
California’s fire safety regulators are finally out with a ‘single stair’ report. They don’t love the ideaCalifornia’s fire safety regulators were asked to study whether mid-rise apartments can go with a single staircase like other countries.
Read more »