Brentwood residents frustrated by large and noisy gatherings — which can include fireworks, public drunkenness, indecent exposure or gunfire— could soon find relief.
BRENTWOOD — Residents frustrated by large and noisy gatherings — which can include fireworks, public drunkenness, indecent exposure or gunfire— could soon find relief with the passing of a new nuisance gatherings ordinance.
Under the new ordinance, a responsible party will first be given a warning, and any subsequent violation within a 12-month period will receive a fine. The first fine would be $100, the second within the one-year period would be $200, and each additional violation after that would be $500, according to a May 12 staff report. The ordinance was created to close enforcement gaps that existing nuisance regulations do not adequately address, said city officials.
The existing Brentwood Municipal Code primarily focuses on nuisances linked to property maintenance and does not sufficiently address other “nuisance activities” that are “highly disruptive” and have a negative impact on public health and safety, the report noted. Among the more than 20 listed examples were indecent exposure, excessive noise or traffic, public drunkenness or unlawful drinking in public, firing of gunshots or brandishing of weapons, indecent exposure, public urination or defecation, harassment of passersby, and excessive littering.
With a unanimous vote, the Brentwood City Council approved the new ordinance during its May 26 meeting, after deliberation over the use of “unruly” in the initial draft. Introduced on May 12 as the “unlawful loud or unruly gatherings” ordinance, the language received pushback from Vice Mayor Pa’tanisha Pierson, who argued that terms like “loud” and “unruly” were not properly defined.
“When you don’t define when unruly is loud to whatever decibel or whatever … it doesn’t provide any distinction as to what loud and unruly is and leaves it overbroad and left up to interpretation of the enforcer of the ordinance,” said Pierson during the May 12 meeting. Following discussions, the City Council agreed to remove the word “loud” from the ordinance’s text and voted in favor of “unlawful or unruly gatherings,” with Pierson dissenting.
During the May 26 meeting, Pierson raised the matter and questioned the use of “unruly” in the ordinance. She said she was not opposed to preventing unlawful behavior but was concerned about the language.
“What I’m against is when we have language that is not clearly defined that can impact marginalized groups,” said Pierson. “Certain terms of art, like ‘unruly’ versus ‘a social nuisance,’ can be used to create circumstances that can be used against marginalized groups. ” Councilmember Jovita Mendoza questioned whether Pierson opposed the definition of “unruly” in the ordinance. Pierson said she had no issues with the definition provided, but was just against the use of the word in that context.
Mendoza said the ordinance provided definitions to guide the police department and staff in determining which activities are deemed unruly.
“If it was just unruly with no other descriptors, I would get what you’re saying, but because it has it in there, I’m kind of okay with it,” said Mendoza. During the public comment period, resident Tracy Kasamoto said she supported the use of the word in the ordinance, adding she has witnessed “unruly behaviors” in her own neighborhood.
“I don’t know what neighborhood you live in, but it must be nice, but there are some of us that don’t get the privilege of having a nice neighbor,” she said. Mayor Susannah Meyer then asked whether councilmembers were agreeable to changing the ordinance title to “unlawful or social nuisance,” as originally proposed, while keeping the definitions.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Dine‑and‑dash couple skips £231 steak dinner after 14 Baby Guinness shots in EssexA couple dined at The Halfway House in Brentwood, Essex, racking up a £231.30 bill before fleeing the scene. CCTV showed them requesting a table near the back door, ordering large portions and 14 Baby Guinness shots, then escaping across the car park without paying. The manager reported the incident to police and posted the footage online, highlighting a rise in dine‑and‑dash incidents across the UK in 2026.
Read more »
Couple's £231.30 Dine and Dash Leaves Restaurant Owner 'Disgusted'A couple's decision to dine and dash at a restaurant in Brentwood, Essex, has left the owner feeling 'disgusted' after they racked up a £231.30 bill and then ran away without paying.
Read more »
Mild winter means more ticks. Here's how to avoid themTicks are more than just a nuisance. They can carry diseases such as Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, tularemia and Colorado tick fever.
Read more »
Tick populations are surging in these states — here’s what homeowners can do to keep their yards safeNot only are ticks a nuisance, but they’ve also led to a growing number of emergency room visits.
Read more »