Both Trump and Biden have criticized Big Tech's favorite law — here's what Section 230 says and why some want it changed.
Such claims of bias inspired Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley's proposed that would tie the law's promise of immunity to a regular audit proving tech companies' algorithms and content-removal practices are "politically neutral.
"repeatedly about how it allows them to remove the most objectionable content from their platforms and protects start-ups from being sued out of existence.Monday that efforts to repeal it would punish small start-ups rather than giants like Facebook and Google.are doing so to find "an advantage against big tech companies." "Whenever laws are passed to put the government in control of speech, the people who get hurt are the least powerful in society," Wyden wrote, referencing SESTA-FOSTA, a 2018 law that made an exception to Section 230 for platforms hosting sex work ads. The law was billed as a way to mitigate sex trafficking, but opponents, including many sex workers, say itHow could the law change? Congress has held several hearings on Section 230 and sought input from academics and tech executives. Lawmakers in both parties admonished the Trump administration'sas Congress continues to debate Section 230's future. Most critics of Section 230 recognize the importance of maintaining some of its key elements, like moderation protections. Former Vice President Joe Biden revealed himself as aThough few others seem to favor a total repeal, lawmakers have expressed interest in scaling back some of the powers of Section 230 or making platforms earn its protections by complying with certain standards. "On 230, I know there are some that have said just get rid of it," Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., told CNBC in an interview in January. Shakowsky had recently hostedin the consumer protection subcommittee, which she chairs. "Our view is that we want to protect First Amendment rights, there's no question. But right now, we think the balance favors those who want a liability shield, and [it] goes way too far in that sense." It's still unclear what specific steps lawmakers may take to change Section 230, but they have often used it as a reminder to tech companies that its protections may not last forever. At the deepfakes hearing, Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., who has advised Congress to revisit Section 230, said, "This hearing should serve as a reminder to all online platforms that we are watching them closely."
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
VA secretary fires back at critics of controversial COVID-19 treatment touted by TrumpVeterans Affairs Secretary Robert Wilkie fired back at critics of his agency's use of a controversial drug touted by Pres. Trump to treat COVID-19 patients in an interview with ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz.
Read more »
Trump asks whether he should take insulin despite not being diabeticAsked later by a reporter why he would take insulin, Trump asked surgeon general Jerome Adams to answer, in which he explained to the president that: 'Your body, Mr. President, actually makes insulin endogenously.'
Read more »
Trump Celebrates Major Layoffs at The Atlantic in ‘Fake News’ Twitter RantIn a series of tweets slamming “fake news” on Tuesday night, President Trump celebrated the major layoffs at The Atlantic that were announced last week. “Great News: The boring bu…
Read more »