President Joe Biden vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have added 66 new federal judgeships to address growing caseloads. The veto drew criticism from judges, lawmakers, and court observers who stressed the urgent need for increased judicial resources.
, a bipartisan bill that sought to add 66 new federal judgeships to address mounting caseloads in courts across the United States.the bill Monday evening and has since drawn widespread rebuke from judges, lawmakers, and court watchers who stressed the urgent need for expanded judicial resources.
Conrad, an appointee of Republican former President George W. Bush, emphasized that Biden’s decision reflects a “regrettable failure” by the administration to support the judiciary and warned that it would exacerbate growing caseloads, further delaying justice for litigants.
Despite pleas from within the judicial branch, Biden cited concerns in his veto about the expedited approval process and the allocation of the judgeships, though deeper concerns among Democrats, like how Trump would gain roughly two-dozen more seats to fill in the next four years, complicated their support of the bill after the 2024 election.
Chief U.S. District Judge Randy Crane of the Southern District of Texas, whose district would have received four additional judgeships, described the veto as a significant blow to court efficiency,The timing of the bill’s passage, just after Republican President-elect Donald Trump’s victory in the Nov. 5 election, led tofrom House Democrats like Rep. Jerrold Nadler that their GOP colleagues had reneged on promises to pass the bill in a nonpartisan manner.
JUDGES Act Federal Judgeships Biden Veto Caseloads Judiciary
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Biden Vetoes Bill to Add 66 Federal JudgesPresident Biden vetoed legislation to add 66 new judges to understaffed federal courts, marking the first major expansion since 1990. While initially bipartisan, concerns about the allocation of judges and the timing of appointments led to the veto.
Read more »
Biden Vetoes Bill to Add 66 Federal JudgesPresident Biden vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have added 66 federal district judgeships, citing concerns about the legislation's haste and unanswered questions regarding the allocation and impact of new judgeships.
Read more »
Biden Vetoes Bill to Add 66 Federal JudgeshipsPresident Biden vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have added 66 federal district judgeships over the next decade, citing concerns about the legislation's hurried passage and unanswered questions about the allocation of new judgeships. Biden argued that the bill failed to adequately address the impact of senior status judges and magistrate judges on the need for additional judgeships and that it would create new positions in states with existing judicial vacancies.
Read more »
Biden Vetoes Bipartisan Bill to Add Federal JudgesPresident Biden vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have added 66 federal district judgeships, citing concerns about the bill's rushed passage and unanswered questions regarding the allocation and impact of new judgeships.
Read more »
Biden Vetoes Bipartisan Bill to Add 66 Federal JudgesPresident Biden vetoed a bipartisan effort to add 66 federal district judgeships, citing concerns about the legislation's hurried passage and unanswered questions about the allocation of new judgeships. The bill, which passed the Senate unanimously, was designed to spread the establishment of new judgeships over more than a decade, allowing multiple administrations and Congresses to make appointments. Biden argued that the bill lacked sufficient study on the need for new judgeships and how they would affect the roles of senior status and magistrate judges.
Read more »
Biden Vetoes Bill to Add 66 Federal JudgeshipsPresident Biden vetoed a bipartisan bill to add 66 federal judgeships, citing concerns about the process and unanswered questions about the allocation of new judgeships.
Read more »