Trump had wanted the case dismissed based on his claim of 'absolute immunity.'
Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media after attending a hearing before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals at the federal courthouse in Washington, Jan. 9, 2024.A three-judge panel in the U.S.
Court of Appeals has rejected former President Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity as it pertains to his "For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant," the judges wrote in their 57-page decision, saying that "Former President Trump lacked any lawful discretionary authority to defy federal criminal law and he is answerable in court for his conduct." "We reject all three potential bases for immunity both as a categorical defense to federal criminal prosecutions of former Presidents and as applied to this case in particular," the decision said."We cannot accept former President Trump's claim that a President has unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralize the most fundamental check on executive power -- the recognition and implementation of election results," wrote the judges. "Nor can we sanction his apparent contention that the Executive has carte blanche to violate the rights of individual citizens to vote and to have their votes count." "At bottom, former President Trump's stance would collapse our system of separated powers by placing the President beyond the reach of all three Branches," they wrote. Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung, responding to the ruling, said in a statement that "President Trump respectfully disagrees with the DC Circuit's decision and will appeal it in order to safeguard the Presidency and the Constitution." "If immunity is not granted to a President, every future President who leaves office will be immediately indicted by the opposing party," the statement said. "Without complete immunity, a President of the United States would not be able to properly function!" Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media after attending a hearing before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals at the federal courthouse in Washington, Jan. 9, 2024.to charges of undertaking a "criminal scheme" to overturn the results of the 2020 election, was seeking the dismissal of the case on the grounds that he has "absolute immunity" from prosecution for actions taken while serving in the nation's highest office. The former president, who attended the Jan. 9 hearing in person, has denied all wrongdoing and denounced the election interference charges as "a persecution of a political opponent."to immediately take up Trump's claims of immunity, declining to grant a writ of certiorari before judgment -- meaning it would allow a federal appeals court to hear the matter first, which is what Trump's legal team had sought.to step in and quickly rule on the issue -- a potentially landmark decision that could, for the first time in American history, determine whether a former U.S. president can be prosecuted for actions taken while in office. In their decision, the appellate judges gave Trump until Feb. 12 to ask the Supreme Court to stay the appellate court's ruling and take up the issue on an emergency basis. It's not immediately clear when the Supreme Court would respond to such a request. Trump could also ask the full D.C. Circuit Court to rehear the case, but that separate request would not prevent the proceedings from being sent back to Judge Chutkan's trial court, unless the full court agreed to take up the issue.
Please follow us on Google to support us United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal Judges Express Skepticism Over Trump's Claim of ImmunityA panel of federal appellate judges raises concerns about Donald Trump's claim of immunity from criminal prosecution and its potential implications.
Read more »
Appeals Court Blocks Texas Education Agency from Enforcing Law on Rating Sexual References in School MaterialsThe 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the Texas Education Agency from enforcing a state law requiring booksellers to rate the explicitness and relevance of sexual references in materials they sell to schools. The court affirmed a lower court’s decision to prevent TEA Commissioner Mike Morath from enforcing the 2023 law.
Read more »
Court: Trump not immune from prosecution in 2020 election interference caseMontgomery, Alabama
Read more »
'Citizen Trump': Appeals Court Says No Immunity in Jan. 6 CaseJessica Corbett is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.
Read more »