The U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) latest net neutrality rules, weakening consumer protections online and potentially allowing internet providers to discriminate against certain websites and services.
An appeals court has overturned the Federal Communications Commission’s latest net neutrality rules, paving the way for internet providers to arbitrarily throttle web access for certain customers and services. The ruling is the latest twist in a decade-long battle in Washington over the FCC ’s ability to regulate telecoms companies.
It is also a sign of executive branch agencies’ waning authority to interpret the statutes they enforce thanks to a 2024 Supreme Court decision, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. That case overturned the court’s previous precedent, known as the Chevron deference, that gave agencies latitude to interpret ambiguous laws. In 2015, the FCC under former President Barack Obama adopted rules that categorized broadband internet providers as telecommunications services and prohibited them from arbitrarily blocking and throttling internet users or giving priority to websites that paid for preferential treatment. Under Donald Trump’s first administration in 2018, the FCC rescinded those net neutrality rules. Then in 2024, under Joe Biden, the FCC voted to restore them. A coalition of telecom industry groups sued to block the rules again, leading to the latest ruling by the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.that for the first 15 years after Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 the FCC oversaw the internet with a “light touch” and classified internet service providers as “information services,” which limited the extent to which the agency could regulate them. That changed in 2015 when the agency interpreted internet service providers to be telecommunication services, a different category under the 1996 law that allowed for stricter regulations. In an earlier series of cases challenging net neutrality rules, federal courts upheld the FCC’s decision to classify internet service providers as telecommunication services, citing the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, In
Net Neutrality FCC Internet Regulation Telecommunications Supreme Court
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Appeals court overturns murder conviction for former Northwestern professor accused of killing boyfriendAn appeals court panel ruled the trial judge unlawfully barred Wyndham Lathem from speaking to his attorney during an overnight recess in the trial.
Read more »
Federal appeals court overturns $367M award to Anchorage in lawsuit over faulty port constructionOfficials say the municipality will continue to press its yearslong legal action against the federal Maritime Administration.
Read more »
California appeals court overturns ex-NFL star Dana Stubblefield’s rape convictionA California appellate court has overturned the rape conviction of former San Francisco 49ers defensive tackle Dana Stubblefield – finding it “legally invalid” – on the grounds of racial bias.
Read more »
Appeals Court Overturns Rape Conviction of Former NFL Player Dana StubblefieldA California appeals court overturned the rape conviction of former San Francisco 49er Dana Stubblefield, citing racially discriminatory statements made by prosecutors during his trial. The court determined that prosecutors violated the California Racial Justice Act of 2020, which prohibits seeking convictions or imposing sentences based on race.
Read more »
Appeals court overturns ex-49er Dana Stubblefield’s rape convictionLOS ANGELES (AP) — A California appeals court has overturned the rape conviction of former San Francisco 49er Dana Stubblefield after determining
Read more »
Appeals Court Overturns Rape Conviction of Former NFL Player Dana StubblefieldA California appeals court overturned the rape conviction of former San Francisco 49ers player Dana Stubblefield, citing racially discriminatory statements made by prosecutors during his trial.
Read more »