By dismissing Sarah Palin's lawsuit against The New York Times, a district judge kept one of the media's landmark legal protections in place — at least for now.
former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's lawsuit against The New York Times, a district judge kept one of the media's landmark legal protections in place — at least for now."I think a lot of media companies and lawyers representing media companies are probably breathing a big sigh of relief right now," said Christy Hull Eikhoff, a media and defamation lawyer at Alston & Bird.
The case, Eikhoff noted, "surprised a lot of media entities and lawyers who specialize in First Amendment jurisprudence," because it's "highly unusual for a public figure's defamation case to get as far as it did."Palin sued the The Times and its former editorial page editor, James Bennet, over an editorial that falsely linked her to a 2011 mass shooting.
Judge Jed S. Rakoff said Palin failed to prove that the paper acted with "actual malice," toward her — the standard the Supreme Court established in the landmark caseThe judge’s rationale "follows both the letter of the law and current precedent for the burden of proof and actual malice, reiterating how high a burden it is, and an earlier dismissal," said Roy Gutterman, professor at Syracuse University’s Newhouse School and director of the Tully Center for Free Speech.
If the jury also sides with The Times, it will be a "very, very uphill battle" for Palin to win on appeal, Eikhoff said. But if it sided with Palin, it would strengthen her appeal.Palin is expected to appeal the decision to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, so this litigation will likely keep going for months. Palin has suggested she ultimately wants to challenge the "actual malice" standard — which would have to go all the way to the Supreme Court.
“It's hard to chalk something up as a win or a loss because with appeals, this could still drag on for a year or more,” Gutterman said.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Judge dismisses Sarah Palin libel lawsuit against New York TimesA judge says he will dismiss a libel lawsuit that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin filed against The New York Times.
Read more »
Sarah Palin Loses Defamation Case Against New York Times As Judge Says He’ll Dismiss ItThe New York Times did not commit defamation when it incorrectly linked former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) to a 2011 mass shooting, the judge in the case ruled after a weeklong trial.
Read more »
Judge to dismiss Sarah Palin defamation case against The New York TimesU.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan said he will order the dismissal of Palin’s lawsuit after the jury finishes deliberating.
Read more »
Judge dismisses Palin libel lawsuit against NY TimesNEW YORK (AP) — A judge said Monday he’ll dismiss a libel lawsuit that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin filed against The New York Times, claiming the newspaper damaged her reputation with an editorial falsely linking her campaign rhetoric to a mass shooting.
Read more »
Sarah Palin Loses Defamation Case Against New York Times As Judge Says He’ll Dismiss ItThe jury is still deliberating in the case, but the judge's opinion is what will carry legal weight.
Read more »