As the cost of losing wetlands is better understood, the case for protecting them should strengthen
visitors flock to the Muscatatuck wildlife refuge in Indiana. Even under scudding clouds, a shallow lake shimmers. It brims with aquatic plants and is lined with reeds and willows. At least 33 types of dragonfly jostle for space. Four-toed salamanders, muskrats and beavers call it home. Box turtles brave roads to reach it. Even the odd human pops by.
Farmers gave up on this marginal land in the last century, defeated by frequent floods. In the 1960s the area won national protection. An earthen berm was built to keep the lake in place. The restored wetland was a rare success. Tramping around its muddy edge, Adam Ward of Indiana University says that nine-tenths of the state’s wetlands have been filled in, farmed or built over. In some other midwestern states the loss is almost total.
Wetlands also clean water, removing pollutants that leach into rivers and contaminate wells. Mr Royer calls wetlands “the kidneys of the landscape”. Rivers used to be fouled by “point source” pollution from outlets such as tanneries or factories. National laws like the Clean Water Act of 1972 mostly ended that. The lingering problem is “non-point” pollution, mostly nitrates washed from fields and suburban lawns, or phosphorus, pathogens and other nasties in urban wastewater.
Water overloaded with nutrients is a curse. It takes roughly two weeks for a drop entering the Wabash river in Indiana to wend its way, via the Mississippi, to the Gulf of Mexico. Each summer algae blooms in the river, fed by nitrates. As these die they feed bacteria which suck oxygen from the water. The result, when the Mississippi gushes into the brine of the Gulf, is a huge oxygen-free dead zone. Last summer the hypoxic area covered 2,700 square miles.
. Mr Ward fears the reverse is happening. The Environmental Protection Agency last year proposed a rule to redefine—and almost certainly reduce—which waters come under the Clean Water Act. Its final plan, which will probably appear this autumn, is expected to give landowners and officials, rather than scientists, more say on whether a body of surface water counts as a flowing stream worth looking after.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Here's Why We Cannot Just 'Nuke' HurricanesHere's why you can't just drop a nuclear bomb in a hurricane to destroy it.
Read more »
30 Things That'll Make You Want To Spend All Summer In Your BackyardWhy go out when you could just hang out in your backyard?
Read more »
Opinion | Why aren’t Trump and Republicans pilloried for failing to ‘reach out’?Why do only Democrats have a moral obligation to 'reach out' to the other side's voters?
Read more »
The new math of saving for retirement may come down to this one, absurdly simple ruleA analysis of tens of millions of 401(k) outcomes found this is the optimum amount to save for retirement:
Read more »
The new math of saving for retirement may boil down to this one, absurdly simple ruleThat 'magic' number of how much to save for retirement? This is as close as we can get to giving it to you:
Read more »
The Best IT Strategy Is Business StrategyIt's time for IT leaders to unequivocally claim their place at the strategic table. paid servicenow
Read more »