Sixty percent of wealthy households support “means-testing” benefits.
The need to reform Social Security — to keep by far the most important government assistance program solvent — has long been obvious. The Baby Boom from 1946 to 1964 kept the ratio of workers paying Social Security taxes to the number of retirees receiving Social Security benefits at a healthy level for decades.
But after birth rates plunged by more than half in the 1970s, the math was plain: Social Security reserves would steadily be depleted when Baby Boomers started turning 65 in 2011, requiring basic changes to keep the benefits that so many rely on from shrinking. It is a sad commentary on the increasing superficiality of American politics that the presidents from January 1993 to January 2009 — Bill Clinton and George W. Bush —last month, should change that.
Trustees warned that if changes are not made, reserves will be wiped out by late 2032, requiring a 22% cut in benefits for the 70 million-plus older Americans forecast to then be receiving monthly checks. Given the long stalemate on this issue, it’s easy to assume that this catastrophe will come to pass.
Many Republicans and affiliated think tanks still seekof Social Security — even though a key to Trump’s political rise in 2016 was his loud disdain for this unpopular approach. Meanwhile, many Democrats and the influential American Association of Retired Persons oppose any changes that go beyond sharply increasing the inflation-adjusted “taxable maximum” of annual wages — $184,500 — subject to the hefty 12.4% Social Security payroll tax.of a reform in which they would face the biggest new burden.
The Reagan National Economic Forum Public Policy Survey, released in May by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute, found far more support for “means testing” — limiting Social Security benefits for the most affluent retirees — than broad tax increases. The survey showed 71% of Americans support this fix, including strong majorities of Democrats, Republicans and independents — and 60% of households earning more than $200,000 per year.
The most common means testing proposal is setting a formula that steadily reduces benefits based on income or wealth thresholds. There would be huge fights over the details. Butby the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget shows the promise of means testing to put Social Security on far more solid ground going forward, averting or limiting the crisis that looms in 2032.
As the survey shows, the most enduring criticism of means testing — that Social Security was deliberately designed as a universal program, not a welfare program, to ensure its durability — simply no longer holds. Most Americans are open to the idea of seeing Social Security as “earned insurance against poverty in old age,” as policy wonk and means-test enthusiast Mickey Kaus
Please follow us on Google to support usUnited States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Trump's Latest Corruption: Hijacking Social SecurityPresident Donald Trump and his Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano are using the program to promote their own politics while actively harming it.
Read more »
Social Security Update: Two Big Changes to Benefit Recipients AnnouncedThe announcement comes as some lawmakers are questioning recent staffing cuts by the SSA and expressing concern over the agency’s customer service capabilities.
Read more »
NYC pols blast Mamdani’s $800M ‘fast bus’ plan, worry it means danger for pedestriansBronx elected officials ripped the MTA on Thursday over bus stops it tore out along Grand Concourse in 2022 — raising red flags about Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s new $800 million plan to spe…
Read more »
What the 'Bad Bunny, Baby' ruling really means: Experts weigh inPuerto Rico’s high court revives ex‑partner’s voice‑rights claims, dealing Bad Bunny a major legal setback.
Read more »