$30 DeepSeek dupe? US scientists claim to duplicate AI model for peanuts

AI News

$30 DeepSeek dupe? US scientists claim to duplicate AI model for peanuts
Ai BubbleDeepseekResearch
  • 📰 IntEngineering
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 25 sec. here
  • 6 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 63%

TinyZero achieves impressive results with minimal resources, raising questions about the cost of AI development.

A group of researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, claims they’ve managed to reproduce the core technology behind DeepSeek’s headline-grabbing AI at a total cost of roughly $30.The news is another twist in a quickly developing narrative about whether building state-of-the-art AI demands colossal budgets or if far more affordable alternatives have been overlooked by tech’s biggest players.

DeepSeek shook the tech world by asserting that training its main model costs merely a few million, substantially less than many U.S. firms spend on AI. According to Pan and his team, it can be done for a mere $30 on a small scale.Still, skeptics have urged caution. Critics point out that DeepSeek’s claimed affordability numbers may not give the complete picture, as the company might be benefiting from alternate resources or distillation techniques from other proprietary models.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

IntEngineering /  🏆 287. in US

Ai Bubble Deepseek Research UCB

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

TinyZero: Open-Source AI Mimics DeepSeek's Capabilities for Just $30TinyZero: Open-Source AI Mimics DeepSeek's Capabilities for Just $30A Berkeley PhD candidate claims his team recreated core functions of DeepSeek's R1-Zero AI model for a mere $30, using a smaller language model trained with reinforcement learning. This breakthrough, dubbed 'TinyZero,' challenges the prevailing paradigm of expensive, data-center-heavy AI development and sparks debate about the accessibility and future of AI research.
Read more »

Berkeley Researchers Recreat DeepSeek AI for Just $30Berkeley Researchers Recreat DeepSeek AI for Just $30A team of researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, have successfully recreated the core technology behind China's DeepSeek AI for an astonishingly low cost of $30. This groundbreaking achievement challenges the notion that developing cutting-edge AI requires massive financial resources.
Read more »

China: AI’s Sputnik moment? A short Q and A on DeepSeekChina: AI’s Sputnik moment? A short Q and A on DeepSeekOn 20 January the Chinese start-up DeepSeek released its AI model DeepSeek-R1.
Read more »

DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: Hands On With DeepSeek’s R1 ChatbotDeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: Hands On With DeepSeek’s R1 ChatbotDeekSeek’s chatbot with the R1 model is a stunning release from the Chinese startup. While it’s an innovation in training efficiency, hallucinations still run rampant.
Read more »

Chinese AI Company DeepSeek Releases Image GeneratorChinese AI Company DeepSeek Releases Image GeneratorOpenAI accuses Chinese AI startup DeepSeek of improperly using its models to train its own image generator, DeepSeek. OpenAI claims to have 'some evidence' that DeepSeek engaged in 'distillation,' a method of replicating AI models by using their output for training. Microsoft, which holds a 49% stake in OpenAI, discovered last fall that individuals linked to DeepSeek had extracted a significant amount of data via OpenAI's API. This news has sparked controversy, with some pointing out the irony of OpenAI accusing DeepSeek of practices similar to those OpenAI itself has been accused of.
Read more »

DeepSeek's ChatGPT Rival Sparks Controversy Over Training MethodsDeepSeek's ChatGPT Rival Sparks Controversy Over Training MethodsChinese startup DeepSeek has caused a stir with its AI model, DeepSeek R1, which rivals ChatGPT in capabilities but was trained at a fraction of the cost. While DeepSeek's achievement is impressive, OpenAI alleges that DeepSeek utilized unethical methods, specifically 'distillation,' by training R1 on data from ChatGPT. This raises concerns about intellectual property theft and potentially violates OpenAI's terms of service. The situation echoes previous controversies surrounding ChatGPT's own training data, further highlighting the ethical complexities in the rapidly evolving field of AI.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-08-27 12:00:31